Best display of SKILLS: Toney-Barkley, Hopkins-Tito, Calzaghe-Lacy or Jones-Toney?

how the **** can anyone ever rate toneys win over barkley

before toney beat barkley, barkley had lost in 1 round to nigel benn and then lost to a shot to **** lightweight in roberto duran :rofl. the **** some of you mother****ers come out with to enhance your favourite fighters legacy is truely embarrassing

its almost as bad as some of you pussywipes hyping up eurobum jirov :-(

 

Aww...the boxrec baby at it again! Looking up records to make his post.
BTW....you didn't answer at all. :yep

And for the record, it's Jones over Toney.

 

i can accept jones over toney in the battle of the disgraceful anabolic steroid cheats, but anyone who votes toney over barkley is a disgrace :deal

 

atsch

Iran Barkley is a 3-weight world champion who holds 2 wins over Thomas Hearns, and only lost on an MD to a prime Michael Nunn. :deal

Jeff Lacy was an overhyped musclebound mediocrity who got outboxed by Omar Sheika in his prime, and got owned in all of his big fights (Calzaghe, Taylor, shot-to-**** Jones).


Barkley >>> Lacy.



And the fact that you said Duran was "shot to ****" shows that you (a) haven't seen that fight, and (b) know nothing about the career of Roberto Duran, but are obviously just a 15 year old Calzaghe fanatic.

 

1 - i never discussed calzaghe (even though it got my vote).

2 - tell me then, what were durans 3 best victories after barkley

 

Calzaghe?


Boxing skill?

 

you can't watch calzaghe v lacy and tell me there was no skill involved in that.

23 out of 24 american boxing journalists tipped lacy to win that fight but in hindsight that was because of the huge amount of narrow minded ignorance that exists in america. anyone with an ounce of boxing knowledge knew what was coming that night.

 

Wow...so you agree. Is tha all you ever do? Find someone to make a post for you, agree, act as if you said it? :roll:

And that's it? With all the vast knowledge you brag about, this is the extent? atsch

 

It gets pretty easy to spot the kiddies here.... :hey

 

i say Hopkins because of the thoroughness of the domination. Hopkins beat Trinidad on the inside, outside, rough house, clean, every single level. the few time Trinidad found Hopkins, he was hit harder. It was the type of beating you don't recover from. Hopkins had one advantage, size. Trinidad had speed, youth, and a whole crowd and country behind him. Hopkins broke Trinidad down in every conceivable way, psychologically and physically. He Executed Tito.

 

i'm not gonna disagree just for the sake of it if i can understand why a poster says that :nut its called being fair.....you should try it in future laaaarrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnce

don't worry, it will never happen with you because you are a vile little sewer rat who loves deepthroating tranny queens :rofl

 

Duran was not shot and that was an incredible performance from both Duran and Barkley. give credit where credit is due

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl that is a good one.

 

your right, that was a prime 37 year old duran fighting at middleweight :rofl

 

no he wasn't prime

have you actually seen the fight? it's one of Duran's craftiest performances