20 Prime Heavyweight boxers who would beat brothers Klitschko

According to nostalgia suckers Wlad loses to any heavweight in history because

- His chin is ****
- In order to hit him you simply have to bob and weave past his jab which is the easiest thing to do and mind you, only fighters pre-2000 were capable of that.
- When a classic fighter has managed do get inside, Wlad does not fight back, neither with his ATG power right hand nor with his devastating Mercer-killer left hook, because he respects the classic boxer's effort of at least trying to come close unlike modern fighters
- A 245lbs, 6'6" perfectly ripped, athletic, olympic gold medalist, multiple world champion, one of the hardest punchers in existence, ATG jabber who hasn't been touched since 6 years and that opponent daring to lay a glove on him was crushed recently in a violent manner, is a perfect match up for 210lbs heavies from the 70s because Wlad has a glas chin and because they're from the past.
- Any sport in the world verifiably evolves and progresses except boxing. The older the better.


FFS dude, out of your list I have a hard time finding five capable boxers of beating Wlad.

 

All of the top 20 would beat the brothers

 

What an awful thread...

I assume Laver beats Federer/Nadal?

And Palmer beats Tiger?

Baylor is better than James?

GTFO here with this nonsense.

If you can't see the ridiculous skill level of the Klits...you are either a moron or a racist...

 

So true :good

People who constantly glamorize the past when it defies logic are the same idiots that couldn't see genuine boxing skill if it punched them in the face.

 

''ridiculous skill level'' atsch


I'm one of the morons, then.

 

1. Lennow Lewis Yes he woud
2. Mike Tyson Yes
3. Evander Holyfield No he would not
4. Donovan Ruddock No
5. Andrew Golota No
6. Riddick Bowe Yes
7. Larry Holmes Yes
8. Joe Frazier No
9. George Foreman Maybe
10. Muhammad Ali Yes
11. Jimmy Young No
12. Sonny Liston Maybe
13. Ken Norton No
14. Michael Spinks No
15. Oliver McCall No
16. Tim Witherspoon No
17. Earnie Shavers No
18. Ron Lyle No
19. Pinklon Thomas/Frank Bruno. No/No
20. Roy Jones. No.

 

Arnold Palmer actually could beat Tiger, yes. Not all the time but he was good enough to beat him. Jack Nicklaus certainly could have beaten him at any point.

What the **** golf has to do with boxing I don't know, though:huh

I suppose there is a similarity in that Woods comp over the years has been just as crap as the Klits whereas Nicklaus had some of the greatest golfers ever to compete with and still prevailed.

I'm baffled by this 'ridiculous skill level' you claim the Klits have though. Anyone with ridiculous skill surely wouldn't quit against a feather fist or get KTFO by an old golfer? Maybe that's why you made the Tiger Woods point :huh

 

Just talking about WALDO here but I think the ones I made red had a better than even chance of shattering his china.

 

I'd replace Thomas and Bruno with Louis and Tunney. Prime Norton and RJ, I don't think so, but if RJ fought a strictly defense, counterpunching type of fight using angles for 12 rounds, possibly edge a very close razor thin win. But the Klits do seem to struggle with big punchers like Sanders did with both and Peter did with Wlad the first time and Peter is as face first as they come, they'd have huge problems with aggressive fighters or punchers like Lyle, Louis, Foreman, Tyson, Marciano, or Dempsey. Punchers with maybe not fast feet, but fast hands.

 

Good post,:yep

 

Really, a very silly post, ray. It's just as silly as Bretcho's Klitschko ass-kissing trolling.

 

It's. All. Relative.

This is an anachronistic discussion. There's no point in having it.

 

You got one right:good