Marquez a....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Arcane, Feb 17, 2011.


  1. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    :nut why ask me questions you assume to know the answers to? Marquez LOST to both John and Norwood, being close fights changes NOTHING his close loss to Pacquiao is something to make noise about, losing a close decision to Freddie ****ing Norwood is not :patsch

    Yeah like he beat Pacquiao twice :dead:dead, you can outbox people all you want but when you're hitting the canvas every other round the scorecards are always going to be close.
     
  2. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    That's put me in my place :patsch
     
  3. davebenoit

    davebenoit Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,639
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    You're probably talking about a lightweight Marguez. I agree with you on that point. But two divisions higher? You must kidding us. :lol:
     
  4. freddy-wak

    freddy-wak M O D E R A T O R Full Member

    36,443
    29
    Oct 28, 2004

    JMM vs NORWOOD wasn't even close....marquez beat him by a lot, add the fact that they didnt even count the knockdowns....:-(
     
  5. davebenoit

    davebenoit Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,639
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    It's more of money. He knows he has snowball's chance in hell to win.
     
  6. davebenoit

    davebenoit Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,639
    0
    Mar 20, 2010
    Marquez lost that one by a mile.
     
  7. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    I hope he gets the Pac fight and leave the ring on a stretcher
     
  8. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    **** happens, to Marqeuz it seems to happen more then others :lol:, I still think he's got one more BIG win in him... winner of Khan/Bradley maybe.
     
  9. RightHandLead17

    RightHandLead17 Active Member Full Member

    1,447
    0
    Nov 11, 2010
  10. carras

    carras Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,596
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
  11. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    :lol: Did I hit a nerve? Why do you think I'd be asking anything from a person that knows zilch about boxing when I'd be wasting my time? The only thing I asked was if you actually watched the fights because you seem to have something vs JMM. Put up a damn poll or look one up and you'll find out how JMM was robbed of victories over Pacquiao, Norwood, and John. In the end it's who the people thought won, not the judges. No one is saying they weren't close, of course they were. But I'll prove you wrong if you think JMM LOST those fights. Even the majority of *******s and *****s acknowledge that. And to answer why he fought Floyd was because of his frustration of Pacquiao avoiding him and not giving him the 3rd fight. JMM fighting Floyd was not a smart move as it was balsy.
     
  12. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    Nothing balsy about getting money :deal
     
  13. LiL

    LiL Guest

    the fraud injury and thinking pac will fight him if he will win ...

    at least he has the URGE
     
  14. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Most probably he knows he has very little chance. But he took the risk anyway. Why?

    One, his biggest payday

    two, chance to get a crack a #1 p4p ranking. An UPSET win can forged another showdown with Pacquiao for the #1 ranking.

    . . . rightnow he has a better chance against Bradley but JMM is not taking that fight. That simply justify my point. :deal
     
  15. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    You don't think going up acouple weight divisions that isn't your natural weight and one where you've never fought before is not balsy? And not only that, but against the best in the world? :rasta