If Haye fights and defeats both Klitschkos will be considered an ATG?

You talk so much ****.

Right, either explain how Haye avoided Adamek at cruiser or admit that you're talking ****

 

I don't know, I don't support Wlad.

 

:rofl

 

It would just about redeem him for the Fraudley shocker. Only just, mind you...

Haye v Harrison - unforgivable!

 

ATG for what?

Having 7 HW fights (assuming he has a mandatory plus both K2 bros)?

For being gifted a belt and fighting crap competition as a HW so far?

For his amazing two year two fight dominance as a non-unified Cruiser champion?

GTFO of here what your crazy talk!

 

I don't think beating those guys now would be ATG since they are getting older now. He has to beat them and then have a list of fights after proving that his wins over them were not flukes.

 

There is nothing Haye can do to become an ATG if he sticks to his October retirement. He'll have too short of a career for any real discussion to be had.

 

Rematch? He would have to rematch Wlad straight away then IF he beat him he would have to fight Vitali? All in the contract, rematch clauses..

 

she's talking ****..

 

I don't think so. Hall of fame maybe but not an ATG. If he did beat both of them it would be a feat that could'nt be ignored, but an ATG ? No.

 

no, beating both the klits would not make haye an ATG heavyweight, just the best HW of this shitty era.

 

:dealNail on the head.

 

its been 3 years since his bull**** "cleaning up the heavyweight division started"
and hes done jack ****....lets just leave it at that....yet to fight 1 klit much less 2
:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Funny!

When you put it like that, and that's basically what it is then it doesn't look good does it.