Better Legacy at Heavyweight Wlad or Tyson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RightCross, Feb 19, 2011.

  1. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    10,533
    Likes Received:
    3
    This is not who beats who, we can all agree that Tyson would likely knock wlads head off early in the fight. Rather, which one of these guys will have a better legacy in the HW division.

    I know Wlad isnt done yet, lets assume he continues on for say 4 more years without a loss and beats everyone in front of him. Who has the better legacy.
     
  2. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2009
    Messages:
    11,656
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tyson, some of his legacy is pure myth, but it's still more of a legacy than Wlad..
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    22,560
    Likes Received:
    68
    Tyson.

    Unless some seriously good heavyweights come along, that won't be close to changing.
     
  4. Faerun

    Faerun Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2009
    Messages:
    13,858
    Likes Received:
    4
    Yeah, no.

    @Poll
    Wlad
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    66
    Tyson. the way he came along this knockout machine and cleaned out a division of guys like Tony Tubbs, Pinklon Thomas, Tony Tucker, Bonecrusher Smith, Trevor Berbick. Tyson had a much bigger impact than the Klitchkos.
     
  6. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    15,428
    Likes Received:
    3
    Tyson, he single handedly took a dying division and brought it back to life in record quick time. Youngest ever HW champ, Undisputed champ for a few years and never had a dull fight.

    WALDO on the other hand has nothing but dull fights and he took a dying division and along with his big sister choked the life out of it.
     
  7. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    12,826
    Likes Received:
    3
    I love the Klit bros, but Tyson without a doubt
     
  8. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    66
    Too bad Tyson didn't retire after he knocked out Spinks. He might be rated 1-3 in the heavyweight ranking and top 15 ever.
     
  9. GTWOSIX

    GTWOSIX Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Seriously? Iron no doubt
     
  10. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    16,591
    Likes Received:
    256

    True enough, I still remember the excitment in the air when Tyson fought. Everyone wanted to be close to a tv and everyone knew a knockout of some kind was coming. It was fairly magical and for a few years, it was thought that Tyson was indestructable and would go down in history as the greatest heavyweight ever. That's why the Douglas upset was such big news. Personally I think if he'd a quite after knocking out Spinks, 3rd would have been too low. It would have been him against Ali and likely most would have picked Tyson to beat Ali, and on that basis, he likely would have been rated number 1 by most people. Certainly no lower than 2.
     
  11. Irländsk

    Irländsk Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,969
    Likes Received:
    6
    Tyson beat Michael Spinks, Marvis Frazier and David Jaco. Yeah he was schooled and KO'd by Buster Douglas while in his prime but his great wins negate this.
     
  12. Bubby

    Bubby Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    3
    Good to see we have one Klitschko hater with the guts to post a poll.:lol:
     
  13. ludwig

    ludwig Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    5,049
    Likes Received:
    59
    Seriously? If Wlad beats everyone in front of him for 4 years, then yes I'd give it to Wlad. That would mean Wlad dominated the division for over 10 years, not even counting his early WBO title reign. He'd be getting up there in the company of Ali, Lewis, and Holmes in terms of stature.

    Tyson was only the dominant guy at heavyweight for about 4 years, and when he came back he was not quite the same fighter.

    If we were talking about who has the better legacy now, I'd give it to Tyson, but if Wlad's next 4 years are similar to his last 4 years, there won't be many names you could put ahead of him.

    Btw if we are just talking about who gave heavyweight boxing the most publicity, then of course it's Tyson--however I don't think that's the question being asked.
     
  14. VecArrow

    VecArrow Custom User Title Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,776
    Likes Received:
    3
    Tyson,

    Also, Tyson = one of the most recognized faces in boxing

    Wlad = one of the most recognized faces of boring.
     
  15. Sean101

    Sean101 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,392
    Likes Received:
    1
    Tyson takes this