:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl All quote of the week material, just can't be bothered, lucky for you.
The logic of the original poster is baffeling. Hearns was beating Leonard on the cards before the KO, does that mean he shoulda won the rematch? Mayorga was beating Mosley before the KO does that mean Mayorga would win a rematch? Cotto was beating Margo before being stopped does that means he wins the rematch? Juan Diaz was beating Marquez in their first fight before the KO did that mean he shoulda won the rematch? This logic is ******ed. Winning the fight on the cards means **** all when you get stopped ....you see in boxing you can win by a thing called a KO or a TKO and it's not strictly who wins the most rounds.
Tyson was losing on the cards when he KO'd Tubbs too. You could list literally dozens of examples to these ****tards and it won't change anything, they're ****ing delusional....in their eyes VITLAY won and that's the end of it, despite the state of his ugly arsed face at the end. I guess if Hearns, Mayorga, Tubbs, Diaz etc had cried like a ****ing ***** about it like VITLAY did then we may have the same kind of argument but it didn't happen because they ain't bitches like VITLAY is.
another about this no on knows who would have won has Lewis not won lol, doesnt matter if Vitali was ahead by a couple rds or not, the way the last round ended Lewis was on top and VK was holding on for dear life. a past prime and not in best condition Lewis beat him, prime for prime there is no doubt whatsoever that Lewis beats both K'bros.