I'd heavily favour Haye. He has the handspeed to get to Chambers and the power to put him away. Don't really want to see this though - if he's not going to fight a Klitschko, I'd only be interested in seeing him against Adamek or maybe Povetkin.
Haye can beat every opponent Wlad can, but quicker, because Haye doesn't throw 10000 jabs a round. Haye KO in 4.
Holy ****! That's exactly my take. :thumbsup Haye's biggest advantage at Heavyweight is speed & decent power. Chambers can def. take a punch, unless Wladimir ruined his chin that is. That is always possible of course, "it's easier to crack an egg that's already been cracked" so the saying goes. I would bet that Chambers lands at least 2-4 punches for every punch that Haye lands flush. That might be enough to crack Haye's egg, which has yet to be really tested at heavyweight.
The "jab" in boxing is the very best tool to set up any power punches you ignorant fool. Wlad's jab by all accounts is a power punch in itself but also sets up his picture perfect 1-2 or hook off the jab. Either punch is enough to KO any man if it lands flush. That's a fact. Have you ever heard another old saying: "The punch that KO's you is the punch you don't see coming" because you have no time to prepare for it? The jab can also be used to "hide" the power punch thrown behind it.
No, he's not. Haye was a fairly quick cruiser and is a damn fast heavy as well obviousy. Chambers loses by knockout.