Clinton the Clown is back making a total fool of himself along with a couple silly cronies, embarrassing for them really. Their lack of knowledge :-(
And yet,on the Pac v Hamed thread,Pac is hammering the overrated quitter by 77% to 23%.So much for a "couple of silly cronies".Prove me wrong,you silly,know nothing,useless poster.And once more for prosperity because it's astonishingly obvious how reluctant you are to answer:what opponent on Hamed's resume indicates he would have beaten Pac?
Your knickers are in a twist because you just got your vagina slapped on the other thread.And if I'm "chatting rubbish" as you claim.Just prove me wrong and I'll admit I'm wrong.You can't.****,you can't even read or count.Although you are right about one thing.I really don't like hamed,haha.
Yeah,everyone else like the 77% of those that voted Pac beats hamed.The only thing oibighead kos Clinton at is being a ****ing idiot as REALLY everyone can see.
Sorry,this is not true.Outside of Britain,when ANYONE talks about Mab's career defining fight(s),they talk about his great trilogy with Eric Morales.In fact,many of the British posters on these boards refer to that great trilogy as Mab's career defining moment(s).But I think you already know that.
In fact,I just perused the Classic section,and a few posters had Barrera-Morales 1 as what they believe to be the Greatest Fight Ever.See for yourself.:good
clinton still pounding away at his keyboard posting 4-5 times in a row out of frustration, nothigns changed.
Delighted to see you're back,jerkoff.And by the way,no frustration.Just have to expose the bullshitters.And more ridiculously stupid self-serving hamed entrance videos coming our way again?
Naz is like Hatton. Good fighter, not a great fighter. Stepping stone for the few who can achieve greatness. Of all his opponents, only the one who beat him managed that.