The Naz hate on here is unreal

Not at all.But as I wrote before,if you are going to prove yourself a liar again,because that's obviously what you are(besides a stupid ****ing,brainless bellend) try to be somewhat plausible.As far as knowing anything about boxing,it's obvious that your knowledge is directly proportional to your intelligence,which are both barely neglible.

 

Hamed is probably one of the greatest featherweights of all time, he was shot against Barrera.

 

the guy had a gift with those banging hands..
who comes walking out in the first round like some rude boy and knocks down his opponent with less effort? Im talkin about said lawal fight..i was 15 at the time and was like wtf just happened?

People can shoot me with this, but his fight against Kevin Kelly was a joke, it was entertaining and dramatic but that very sloppy..Naz was off balance from the get go and letting himself get tagged. Nice finnish though..

I will always see Naz as a tremendous potential of being something great and look back now as a marvellous champion for his time. For people to **** on him like he brought nothing needs to keep it shut.

 

bad attempt of intelligence btw (neglible means small and unimportant, therefore your implying what I said was 'barely unimportant'; ie not unimportant... but w/e) . . .


You've jumped through 2 threads attacking the credibility of Nas and anyone who puts forth their opinion on him.

You try to discredit his wins , and his career in general basing it all off one loss.

None of that is a lie.

 

Judging by what his nutsuckers on these boards write,it is obvious how overrated he is by them(and you,of course because you are a bigtime hamed nutsucker).But if you look at REALITY and FACTS and count how many elites he beat-A BIG FAT ****ING ZERO-the truth is evident.He was a good(Maybe very good.Just maybe) featherweight due to his,power,reflexes and speed.But he was deficient and weak in so many important categories that he could never be an elite:fundamentals,balance,discipline,ring IQ and technical skills,that any elite in any era at 126 with toughness,intelligence and fundamental skills would have had their way with him as MAB did.And any openminded boxing fan who is not blinded by nationalism or the silly desire to be entertained by total theatrical nonsense could see that.In reality,hamed spent as much time being a dick before,during and after a fight as Hector Camacho did before him and Pauli Malignaggi did after him,that it was VERY easy to dislike him as a fighter and a person(although neither one of those idiots behaved as badly as he did.His treatment of his opponents was reprehensible,except of course,MAB,then it was quite funny.).And considering that he NEVER beat an elite,and the only one he fought beat him around the ring like a ***** proves how overrated he was as he quit the ring after his next opponent at the ripe old age of 28.All I ask is that and your ilk continue to contribute your drivel to the continuous hamed nutsucking threads as you cannot fathom how ridiculous it is for someone like me-and obviously the majority of esb,as what 77% of those responders had PAC beating him at 126.You've simply no idea how ridiculous and pathetic you ****ing sound.See you soon,numpty:good:hi:

 

No.Wrong again as ****ing usual.The fact is that Hamed avoided the elites of his day and fought decent alphabet beltholders and that's it.Obviously you haven't read the posts because if you had,you NEVER would have written this contri.Or maybe you would have ,because it's obvious what a numpty you are.This is so ****ing easy.And yes,what you wrote is small and unimportant,but the implication is that you consider what you write LARGE and IMPORTANT just goes to show what a.......aww **** it's getting so redundant about you,haha.What I've done is present facts and you and your ilk are offended by reality and actual events (based in part by your blind nationalism).It is THAT ****ING SIMPLE.I presented my opinion based on FACTS and you and your other hamed nutsuckers are offended by reality.It's quite ridiculous,really,hahaha.

 

contri?

'whta a numpty'

right....

"The Naz hate on here is unreal" - indeed it is... and its fulled by delusional posters such as yourself.


Ring Magazine Featherweight ratings of Hameds opponents when he faced them:

Steve Robinson #3
Manuel Medina #3
Tom Johnson #1
Kevin Kelley #5
Wilfredo Vazquez #4
Cesar Soto #5
Vuyani Bungu #4

World Title fights record : 16-0 with 14 KOs

 

Naz always fought like he was watching himself in a mirror, ie more bothered about aesthetics and how he looked than concentrating on his boxing. He had a lot of natural talent which was both a blessing and a curse, like he felt he didn't have to bother with the fundamentals like everyone else because his odd angles, natural ability and power would get him through. This was true against 99% of everyone he fought, but nowhere near enough to beat the very best, which of course he only fought once because he was a typically Warren-protected fighter for much of his career. He displayed a complete lack of balls retiring so young though, his talent and his fans (including me) deserved more than that.

Shame really, if he'd worked on the basics and been less bothered about looking 'gangsta', he would probably be an ATG, but then he wouldn't be the same Naz that we all love or hate and he probably wouldn't have half the money he has now. He brought in a lot of young new fans to boxing as well, which is always a good thing.

 

He behavior towards his opponents was reprehensible.NO ****ING PEOPLE **** ON HIM ANYWHERE NEARLY AS BADLY AS HE **** ON HIS LESSER OPPONENTS.He acted like a ****ing dick in and out of the ring.He avoided the elites of his day.He got completely outboxed by an elite,fought once more against someone named Calvo and then quit at the ripe old age of 28.I'm sorry that you're offended by reality.

 

This is a very bad statement based on reality.In order to be an elite,you have to beat one.Hamed never beat an elite.Never.He beat some decent alphabet title holders,but that's about it.

 

Me,delusional?NAAAH.That title belongs to you and your ilk.Now for the reality check.
Steve Robinson had 9 losses when he fought Hamed.NINE coupled with,what,22 victories?As much as I like the Cymru ones,he was a good,tough fighter but obviously nothing great.
Medina,Vasquez and Soto all had-I believe,I'm just not sure-at least 7 losses EACH when they fought hamed.
Tom Johnson was THIRTY-THREE ****ING YEARS OLD when he and dickhead fought.At 33,he was most certainly past his best,especially at 126 as the lighter fellows don't age as well as the big guys.****,heavyweight David Haye wants to retire at 31.
When he and hamed fought,Vivian Bungu was fighting above 122 for-the what time?In 2 of his 3 previous fights at 122,he won a split decision and a majority decision at that weight.
Kevin Kelley.2 1/2 years before he fought hamed,he was ko'd by a Mexican fellow whose name escapes me.Perhaps you can enlighten us?
Just because these fellows are ranked high doesn't mean they are elite.It just proves that there's not anything else that's impressive before them.Thank you for writing that useless contri.Sorry to burst your pathetic bubble

 

coming from someone who thought cotto and margarito were punching bags.atsch

 

Can't be arsed to read through the whole thread but Prince is very underrated on here IMO. One lost decision and suddenly he's fake and all :roll:

He was a unique, special fighter. One of the best thing that happened to boxing in the last 20 years.

 

so im delusional for supporting a fighter...

"On September 30 1995 21 year old Naseem Hamed became WBO FW Champion of the world when he went into Welshman Steve Robinsons backyard(Cardiff) and easily won every round before stopping him in the eighth.

After a couple of soft defences Naz then defended his title against Manuel Medina,yeah the guy who was a five time FW World Champion.
Biased haters will tell you that the 25 year old Medina was past his best when he fought Naz but will fail to tell you that Medina would go on to win a version of the FW title another three times after Naseem Hamed beat him up and made the ringside doctor stop the fight.


After destroying the overmatched Molina in 2 rds Hamed then started 97 with a unification fight with American Tom ‘Boom Boom’ Johnson,a year in which Hamed would have five title fights and win all five by KO.
Johnson was the IBF FW Champion who had made 11 title defences and hadnt tasted defeat for over five years when he met Hamed in February of 97.Like most fighters who fought prime Naz he was knocked out in eight and Hamed was now a unified IBF/WBO FW Champion.

After knocking out former three time world title challenger Billy Hardy in the first rd and making a couple of easy defences Naz then made his way across the pond to fight Kevin Kelley in his backyard at Madison Square Garden in New York City.

Kelley the ‘Flushing Flash’ was 47-1 when he fought Naz and was the former WBC FW Champion who had reigned for two years whos sole defeat was almost three years before the Hamed fight.
In a FOTY candidate both fighters where dropped before Naz finally knocked out Kelly in the 4th round to take his record to 29-0 with an amazing 27 of those wins coming by KO.

Next was Wilfredo Vazquez a former three weight World Champion and the current WBA FW Champion who was stripped of his title because the WBA did not want their title to be unified with the WBO thus denying Hamed the chance to hold all four FW titles.
Vazquez had made nine defences of his WBA 122lb title and four defences of his WBA FW title when Naz knocked him out in seven rounds in April 1998.

After winning an easy decision over iron chinned Wayne McCullough and then knocking out Paul Ingle in 11 rds(Ingle would go on to get wins over Manuel Medina & Junior Jones)Hamed then unified his WBO title yet again when he fought WBC FW Champion Cesar Soto in Detroit at the end of 99.
Soto knocked out Jose Luis Castillo in two rds and had just won the WBC five months before when he was easily outpointed against Hamed with his record now standing at 33-0.

Next came Vuyani Bungu the former IBF 122lb Champion who had made 11 defences of that title and was unbeaten in 19 fights when he stepped into the ring with Hamed.
Hamed knocked him out in four and then defends against Augie Sanchez the man who beat Floyd Mayweather Jr in the Amateur ranks and hadnt lost in 10 fights when he stepped into the ring with Hamed in August 2000,sadly for him he would leave the ring on a stretcher as Naz knocks him out in four.

Naseem Hamed made 15 defences of his WBO FW title and unified it with the WBC & IBF and also destroyed the WBA Champion but because of politics he wasnt able to hold every title in the division."

 

WOW.WHAT A RESUME.atsch.You took all that time to type that out even though they were already exposed?Quite telling because there's not one elite on it,just a bunch of not very impressive alphabet belt titleholders.My previous post proves all of those guys were good,but nothing special when hamed got around to fighting them.And I'm so ****ing delighted that you brought up Augie Sanchez.First off,Randy Shields beat Sugar Ray Leonard in the amateurs and we all know how that ended up when they were pros,so this "what they did as amateur" bull**** holds as much significance in this debate as ANY of your opinions.Now back to Augie.As a pro,Augie Sanchez lost 3 times as a pronce BEFORE hamed,and ONCE after him.On ALL THREE OCCASIONS,Sanchez was stretchered out of the ring.That's right-THREE ****ING TIMES INCLUDING ONCE BEFORE FIGHTING DICKHEAD.What's extremely hilarious is that most people don't remember the other 2 that that stretched Augie out.And btw,despite losing just 3 times in his career,Sanchez can't even get a license to fight in his homestate of Nevada due to his THREE brutal losses.If you want to use Augie as a positive on hamed's resume,keep it up.Keep grasping for straws.Once again,this is so ****ing easy