The Naz hate on here is unreal

ok thats ****ing impressive

 

its easy to discredit fighters

pacs only fought past prime/weight drained fighters 135 and above
mayweather has never fought anybody and lost to Castillo
tyson was the only good fighter in a weak division and lost as soon as he stepped up

your saying im grasping at straws... im not.. i support nas and thats his resume... yes its not SRL's resume but its still solid. Its easy to stand there and discredit fighter, but you wernt the one fighting them. All these fighters who are nobodies acording to you where all at the time fighting in the biggest fight of their careers and all came to win (and whether you admit it or not alot of these fighters had very solid resumes)

he lost to barrera... so have lots of people...barrera lost to junior jones twice who lost to paul ingle who as an unbeaten fighter lost to nas.. i guess that means barrera isnt a top fighter according to your logic

 

are you guys still responding to that pedo?

i put him on ignore a few posts back.

 

wise words and END OF THREAD!!!

 

wtf!!????..

 

You are the absolute king of bad posts-you,boy racer and relentless,that is.One more time,if you are going to lie,at least write down something that might be palatable because you write pure bull****.I NEVER,NEVER wrote that all Hamed fought was nobodies.****ING NEVER.That statement of yours is a pure ****ing lie.:yepWhat I wrote is that Hamed's resume is full of decent ,but nothing special alphabet beltholders which I proved outright in my posts even while you tried to lift those fellows into a higher category.First off,Pac beat Mab at 126,so whatever you're implying in your nonsensical statement above,it doesn't matter because that accomplishment alone is better than anything Hamed did in his career.And I've no idea why you're bringing Mayweather into it,but you opened up the floodgates because,when he was fighting at 130,he challenged hamed at a catchweight of 128,to which hamed replied,"How many times do you want me to move up?".The problem is with people like you is that you believe what you want to believe despite facts that point to the contrary.That's fine because everyone on earth has his or her own set of pipedreams and it's obvious what yours is.

 

You talking about your daddy again?Come back,Relentless.I need to show you more facts instead of opinion.There is so much more work to do.

 

SWIM WITHOUT GETTING WET

:good

 

Nope.Not wise words and not end of thread.Hamed was overrated and a ***** in and out of the ring.And his supporters make more excuses for him than any fighter I've ever seen especially for just one loss.

 

I do believe Naz is underrated on here.

He had amazing talent but no discipline or mental strenght whatsoever.

 

Nas was good for the game, cocky, unorthodox & exciting.

Imagine how much worse the hate would be if he had the majority of his career post 9/11

 

Good post. :good

 

I am hearing people talk of his arrogance but he had no more arrogance than other top American level fighters.Its only because he was a confident Brit thats why he`s getting **** for it.He got humbled by the great Anthonio Barerra anyway so his fights were good while it lasted.

 

:tired

 

Easily the hardest hitting featherweight of all time - if I am wrong please explain who could hit harder at the weight .

Naz's downfall was his own super ego mania and his inability to process the MAB loss and come back from it - then he went to jail for a while and had a lot of family issues as well , he blew up into a 5'4" 190 beachball - such a waste , he was still pretty young at the time of his loss to MAB - he could have went on to greatness .