Cassius Clay 1964 vs Muhammad Ali 66-67

The 1966/67 version of Ali had all the speed and slipperiness of his younger Clay self,plus a lot more seasoning. He was also physically stronger.

 

The Cassius Clay of 1964 would be calling the 66/67 Muhammad Ali a 'draft-dodger',
'a 'wife-beater' and 'religous fanatic', and 'anti-American'.

 

Elaborate,my friend !

 

the slipperiest i ever saw him was against folley in 67 personally

 

Elaborate,

If 'mental war-fare' was employed, the 66/67 Ali would say the 1964 Cassius Clay
was owned by ''11' white businessmen.

 

ali 66 would beat
by sd, but it would be close. clay 64 was very young,very fast , his legs were in his peak(speed) and he was hungry of victory. but the experience of ali 66-67 would be the key factor.
i can´t see other fighter in the history winning against clay 64 the night in miami.

 

They would both be argueing about who was the prettiest !

 

The Zaire Ali of '74 could pip the Cassius of ten years earlier,but he would n't beat his 1966/67 self. How big a margin do you think that the Kinshasa Ali would beat the 36 year old version who beat Leon Spinks in New Orleans ? This is getting really surreal

 

:good "WE are the greatest....and prettiest of all time..."

 

I think I'm tripping out here...

 

Your input is not required in threads involving Ali.