Patterson & Tyson style

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by DeadlyOverhand, Mar 2, 2011.


  1. DeadlyOverhand

    DeadlyOverhand Active Member Full Member

    828
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    Who do you think that the Peek-a-boo Style fit better, on Patterson or Tyson
    They were about 2in. difference, but Patterson would come in at around 180 or 190, while Tyson in his early career would come in at 205 or 211, both same reach

    Tyson - shorter(by 2 ins.) stocky, fast, & good power.....71in. reach
    Patterson - Lean, lighting fast, with a Pop in his punches.....71in. reach
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Patterson, his handspeed when he was hooking in full flow was ridiculous, so strict peek a boo i would say him, Tyson was great technically and a fine counterpuncher so therefore can work as a combo puncher, aggressing with body shots etc, looking for openings. Patterson might as well just jump at people with rapid assaults, because he's so fast it works perfectly for him. If there was a cruiserweight back then it wouldda been a rap
     
  3. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    53
    Dec 26, 2009
    Well his sub-200lb weight has something to do with it, i mean obviously he's going to be a bit faster than Tyson, he didn't weigh 220lbs!
     
  4. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Tyson, because he was a bigger puncher and quicker. The peekaboo causes the fighter to square up and throw wide punches. A guy who doesnt have power to begin with, is not going to benefit from that kind of fighting style. Patterson used the style well, but Tyson with his physical attributes, speed, stubby arms and power benefitted from it the most.
     
  5. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    Easily Tyson. Patterson lacked the power, durability, and ferocity, even if he were a bit more guided and technically correct. Patterson generally picked you apart with combinations, Tyson bulldozed you with them.
     
  6. thegoldenera

    thegoldenera Guest

    what?¿:verysad
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I love watching both, Patterson and young Tyson but I like Patterson more overall. More pleasing to my eye. But it´s by a **** hair.
     
  8. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    Of Tyson, not in general.
     
  9. thegoldenera

    thegoldenera Guest

    of course tyson had more power, principally because patterson was not even a hw, but pfp he had great power. he did not lack of power.
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    I never said he did, I said he wasn't as good as Tyson at employing the style for a combination of the factors I named. Next.
     
  11. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    27
    Nov 15, 2009
    Mother ****er you dont know no **** about no **** hair. ***** ass buster.
     
  12. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    27
    Nov 15, 2009
    Tyson was built for that style. Thats why Cus favoured him so much, he was the perfect specimen to be moulded by Cus, in the style that he taught.
     
  13. Tyson had MORE then good power , he ranks top 5 punchers of all-time. ATG POWER
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Yeah, your´s was completly shaved.
     
  15. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I like that Patterson incorporates a little more standup boxing in his version(gives him some versatility), but prime for prime Tyson is the more devastating operator here, maybe a bit slower but the leverage is just incredible.