No offence mate but I could care less what you heard. There will always be someone making out that the attacker was hard done by. There will always be people in the boxing fraternity that want to make excuses for one of their own too. I'll go by what was charged, admitted to and convicted in court. He admitted to the offence as listed, didn't offer any defence for his behaviour and was convicted of the offence. Whatever people want to tell you about him being attacked first or things not happening that way is just ****ing fairytales. What happend is a matter of public record now so there are no if's and but's. No one is jumping to any conclusions lads. I know you're not thick so I'm sure you're able to fully comprehend that he was given his day in court to defend himself and prove that the version of events you've stated where he is hard done by is true. He didn't do that. He didn't deny any charges and he didn't offer any defence. He admitted to everything that was stated and was convicted of the charges. You do realise thats about as definitive as it gets? There are no assumptions in any of this. Only facts, an admission and a conviction.
im sure u will hear this song if u do attend:good [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIjr6LRfIv4&feature=related[/ame]
Usually they protest their innocent on their way there rather than confess their guilt Bit of a difference there Fra.
unfortunetly due to the fact that these two fighters (rick godding 12-0 and gary mcmillen 11-2 ) have refused to take me on an instead chose to fight each other i will not be on the 19th and will be pushed back to a big card in may, canot wait to get back in that sqaured circle an start smashin heads from deanos facebook