It's all good. I only watched it once. I recorded it on the DVR but I was so frustrated with the decision that I immediately deleted it. I'll try to catch the repeat when it comes on again and this time I'll score it by actually counting the strikes.
14-4 so far.......................I can't be that far off. Maybe not a robbery but in my opinion a draw would've still been a gift to Diego.
There's aggression, and then there's effective aggression. If you can't be effectively aggressive and inflict more damage than your opponent, your probably losing a fight, aren't you? I mean especially if your opponent is using your aggression and basically putting your face through a shredder?
Are you retarted? I'm a Kampmann fan but he didn't enough in the 3rd round to win the fight. It was a close fight but to call it a robbery is stupid. the UFC doesn't get the judges they come from the athletic commissions, that is old news.
How can a thumb to the eye be ineffective in a fight? I know what you meant. It's not a legal strike. I may try to find the video to re-watch the 2nd round.
WTF? How was the third clearly DS? Coming forward eating shots doesn't get you the round. Blind aggression isn't more important than clean striking or defense (both to strikes and takedowns) which Kampman had in both the first and third rounds. I honestly think that was one of the worst decisions I've seen. I just don't get it. Not trolling, I just don't see it. At all.
Wow man, good for you. There are a lot of people on this board and elsewhere who won't ever admit that they were wrong, much less explain way. Cheers. :good
