How did you really score Pascal vs Hopkins? Hopkins is a fighter that is an American legend and I wonder how many really thought he was robbed. A Tarver said "It was a great fight. But I dont think Hopkins won the fight. I gave the champion the last round and I think a draw was fair. I gave it to Pascal by one point but it could have went either way" "I understand why Hopkins feels the way he does. Judge the fight watching two fighters. They didnt judge the fight as being a 45 year old man doing what he did. If I had of judged it that way, I would have it for Hopkins going away. But its not about age; Its about the fight at hand. And Pascal was the champion. I dont think Hopkins did enough to take it from the champion" I wonder how correct Tarver was with what he said there as did people give it to Hopkins because of who he is? If the fight was reversed and Hopkins had of scored 2 KDs with Pascal finishing strong would these same people think Hopkins won? So what was your scorecard and be completely honest
Most people will have it fo Hopkins and I have no problem with this. Personally, I had it 114-113 Pascal (final score, don't remember the round-by-round scorecard, though).
Why dont you post yours? As I recall it to me when I was watching live(might not be 100% correct) Live Round 1 Pascal 10-8 Round 2 Pascal 10-9 Round 3 Pascal 10-8 Round 4 Hopkins 10-9 Round 5 Pascal 10-9 Round 6 Hopkins 10-9 Round 7 Hopkins 10-9 Round 8 Pascal 10-9 Round 9 Hopkins 10-9 Round 10 Hopkins 10-9 Round 11 Hopkins 10-9 Round 12 Pascal 10-9 Making Pascal a 2 point winner. Rewatched the fight and seemed to think Hopkins might have done it but cant remember which rounds I saw different. I think I might have seen one of the rounds to Hopkins making it a draw. Will have to rewatch to be more accurate to what I remember, but was curious to what others saw as so many have said Hopkins. Now lets see your card
Bailey, shut yo ***** ass up. pascal did a million times better against hopkins than the guy you give blowjobs to everyday. and he had the heart to give a rematch. he floored hopkins twice, landed more clean punches than anyone over the last 10 years, and even though he spent much of the fight running like a *****, he deserved to retain his titles. had BHop continued going to the body, he would've ko'd pascal. the losses BHop has sustained against pascal (draw, lost, same thing) and calzaghe were because of himself, nothing either of them did. but to answer your question, a draw was the perfect call. pascal did great against a faded warrior, and hopkins' resilience had the young champion running. a draw was a great call. the real question is, how did your ***** ass score calzaghe vs hopkins? like harold letterman? i'm sure, because you're a groupie who's fighter is god, that's why you're on your knees for him every night.
Was just asking since you created it. So often guys make these and don't give their scores. Thanks though. But I didn't score it. Tending to guests and the food when it was on. I was fine with a draw. I thought Hopkins coming on late was big, but the KD's are hard to overcome.
I scored the first 3 rounds to Pascal (plus the 2 points for the two knockdowns) and round 4-11 for Hopkins with round 12 even. I can understand giving round 12 to Pascal, though. So even giving round 12 to Pascal I still would have it 114-112 Hopkins.
I struggled to score anything past round 3 for Pascal. I remember thinking Hopikins needs to win basically all these rounds and just about giving it to him. There were one or two competitive rounds which could have gone either way but overall I thought Hopkins squeeked it in the most difficult of circumstances.
WTF, You still crying because Calzaghe beat Hopkins :neutral: Live with it, it happend Now concentrate on this thread. Theres a good kid