How Legit is "The Ring" anymore?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxingstar1, Mar 23, 2011.


  1. boxingstar1

    boxingstar1 Member Full Member

    188
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    I've been on this site for years (2001 I think) in one form or another and when I was younger I picked up every copy of "The Ring" that came out. I bought K.O, and every other boxing mag I could find. Then I went away for 2 years and when I came back I just diddnt have the love for the sport anymore. I boxed from 13 till about 22 as an amature and I did good for myself, but I lost the love.

    Then I started picking up copies again and watching my HBO and showtime and I'm starting to get that love back, but to be back here on ESB I'm a little worried about the direction of boxing fans. The Ring magazine is a bright spot in boxing and I see so many people talking about how "belts mean nothing"

    This is wrong. I look at the ring mag and see about 6 of the weight classes have Ring mag champions and I shudder to think what happens in another 10 years.

    average fans dont want to hear "WBO champ so and so"

    They want to see "The middleweight champion of the world is fighting tonight"

    So How much credit is givin to the ring mag these days on here: just wondering so I know how to proceed here.
     
  2. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    I can't speak for anyone else, but as a publication The Ring is still the best boxing periodical and I consider their rankings and their championship belts to be the most legitimate.
     
  3. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    Still more legit than anyone else out there
     
  4. tofu2009

    tofu2009 Active Member Full Member

    978
    1
    Feb 16, 2011
    The Ring's pound for pound ratings system is more of a popularity contest these days, with a push possible if you happen to be from a particular country.
     
  5. boxingstar1

    boxingstar1 Member Full Member

    188
    0
    Feb 18, 2010
    I don't disagree with this. I hate P4P rankings, I think the whole idea is stupid personaly.

    I ment about the weight class rankings though, any thoughts about that?
     
  6. BatTheMan

    BatTheMan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,416
    0
    Jun 6, 2008
    I think The Ring lost a lot of credibility when it was taken over by GBP. This deal places a lot of scrutiny on their rankings and the editorial choice of stories.

    Still the Ring is IMO a fine read with some of the best writers in the business.
     
  7. boxersk

    boxersk T.C.B. Full Member

    194
    0
    Mar 16, 2011
    I pick up every issue of the The Ring magazine i think it keeps people informed. And they have a new look to the magazine which is cool.
     
  8. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Yeah I don't really care for P4P rankings from anyone though but their weight class rankings are good. I like how they don't rush to crown a champion since they don't get sanctioning fees like the ABCs.
     
  9. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    boxing needs something that controls the sanctioning bodies, a kind of fifa for boxing.
     
  10. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    55
    Dec 5, 2006
    I think Golden Boy Promotions owns a major share in The Ring. Even if they are running thing on the up an up. No promational company should have any ownership in The Ring.
     
  11. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,690
    Sep 8, 2010
    Yeah, The Ring is the best. Love it and they've updated their website good lately. Their rankings are accurate 80% of the time, but that 20% is a strange bunch. Rios over Soto? Upping Pacquiao after he fought a 150 lb'er for a jnr. middle title? Dzinziruk only 8 at 154, below Wolak, Vanes, Powell, Rhodes? Cloud warrants higher placement than Dawson? Narvaez is #5 in their 115 rankings and ought to be leap frogged to #2/3 at the least. Judging by their "what have you done lately" attitude displayed in the above examples, Zab Judah is robbed below Urango and Kotelnik.
     
  12. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Ive collected The Ring since rhe 90s and its still the bible of boxing, but recently its been praising heresy. For example, they Powell in the top 10 at 154 and made a mistake on Paul Williams record with only one loss and supposedley it was updated in march. Those are just acouple of things. They slippin.
     
  13. mr fists

    mr fists Active Member Full Member

    939
    0
    Sep 17, 2010
    the mag is still good but a lot of the articles on the website just promote goldenboy fighters
     
  14. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    In my opinion, their belts are the most prestigious in the sport although, admittedly, that isn't saying much.

    I don't pay any more attention to their P4P rankings than I do anyone elses.
     
  15. Tyler-Durden

    Tyler-Durden Boxing Junkie banned

    11,190
    1
    Mar 24, 2010
    This. :hat