Why is Wladimir Klitschko So Overrated?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Johnson Knows, Mar 24, 2011.


  1. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    24
    Jan 29, 2011
    I'm not a fan of either Klit, they are effective but very boring.

    When I watch their fights I prefer them with german commentary. I dont speak any german but it makes it watchable.
     
  2. or Mike Tyson. Analysing an opponent is one thing but pulling off a plan that sees a fighter operate in a different way is another. Most of the time this doesn't happen.
     
  3. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009

    :scaredas:
     
  4. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    good excuse. toney is still better than most the guys they have faced.
     
  5. I'd put it to you that this isn't the case.
     
  6. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    Really?? :shock:

    I think Audley would Ko Wlad in 1 round


    Ok im starting to make my self feel sick.... Im joking ;)
     
  7. No but Haye hasn't been struggling with these guys. Both Haye and WK have fought **** oppostition and it's a matter of what you see in them through their performances as to how you make a prediction.
     
  8. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Both wlad and Haye get completely.overrated and underrated at the dame time. At heavy, wlad is much more proven. His chin may be shaky, but he changed his style to mitigate the risks of someone getting inside.

    Haye is a gun-slinger. that gives him advantages over some opponents, but probably not over a cautious methodical fighter.

    I think wlad has to seen as a decent favourite. But i'm sure it's going to a tedious fight until one of them.lands a sneaky shot late on.
     
  9. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,407
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    :nut:rofl
     
  10. TheUzi

    TheUzi MISSION INCOMPLETE Full Member

    7,358
    0
    Jul 23, 2008
    Agree with this.

    As for the fight, i think it will be fascinating, i know alot of people expect a stinker but i dont. It will be tense and dramatic.
     
  11. I've seen Wladimir included in top 20 heavyweights of all time lists. This is madness.
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    He's right IMO.

    Whoever 'Stocks' is, you are a f'n mong mush, that is all.
     
  13. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Why is it?

    I'd say between 15-20 is about right for Wlad.
     
  14. He hasn't fought, let alone beaten a good heavyweight. Added to this is the fact that he's split this eras top contenders with his brother to a certain extent and would have been smashed to bits by most top fighters from the past. I'd even pick a pre war fighter like Dempsey to take him out. If his flaws hadn't already been so clearly exposed there would be good reason to consider him amongst the top 20 but this isn't the case.
     
  15. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    He's only overrated by his fans. Same as virtually every other fighter.

    Most people just recognize he's been the most consistent and accomplished heavyweight since Lewis. That's not really up for debate, he's fought a long list of contenders. Which admittedly havn't always been top notch but thats whats available.