Kevin McBride says Adamek is a steppingstone to Klitschko

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by slapbangwhallop, Mar 27, 2011.


  1. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    Yeah i wouldn't moan if he landed on Adamek and KO'd him. These fights are embarrassing to the sport. People moan at Haye......ok i admire his activity but come on i think Haye could take his last 3 opponents out on one night it's that bad a list.
     
  2. KillerDeluxe

    KillerDeluxe Guest

    :lol::patsch

    hope you're joking.
     
  3. KillerDeluxe

    KillerDeluxe Guest

    Its much easier saying you could do something than actually doing that something.

    Just face it, Haye is all bark and no bite. Adamek is all bite and no bark. Fighters like Haye are what is embarrassing the sport, not Adamek.
     
  4. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    :lol:
     
  5. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    :lol: so Haye would beat his last 3 opponents with ease?
     
  6. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I would love it if Mcbride beat him
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Why would I be joking? Maddalone, McBride and the corpse of Michael Grant?

    Haye's done a lot better than that.
     
  8. KillerDeluxe

    KillerDeluxe Guest

    Tomasz Adamek is a contender. David Haye has a title. Big difference when you put in the opponent deciding factor.

    Tomasz can fight anyone he wants, weather its McBride or Grant or Maddalone, as long as he is gaining that learning experience. This is a former Light Heavyweight we are talking about. Plus, hes fighting a Klitschko in his NEXT FIGHT, so why opt for a higher risk?

    Haye on the other hand, has a title. He has no excuse fighting these no hoppers like Harrison, who has done nothing at all to get that title shot. Adamek is just sticking his head out there and facing valuable opponents before taking on the very experienced K2 brothers.

    It took Team Adamek 2 weeks to agree to a K2 contract. It took Haye over 2 years. Don't overlook my post and change the subject, Haye is the one that is killing HW boxing not Adamek.

    And for those of you wishing a Adamek loss by the hands of McBride, thats just pathetic. You do realize a McBride win would stoop the HW division even LOWER than what it already is, right? Why would anyone wish this, i have no clue. Unless your a hardcore Irish boxing fan, id understand, but not some clueless idiot form Iceland / London. Wishing a Adamek loss to McBride is like taking a sharp knife and stabbing HW boxing right in the heart.

    And to awnser your question, no, Haye would not beat Adameks last 3 opponents with ease. Chris Arreola is a tough contender and he seems more rejuvinated with Shields in his corner now. Haye would not have a "easy time" with Chris Arreola. Grant also has the potential giving Haye problems, as Haye, has always had problems fighting fighters taller than he is(vs. Valuev, and vs. Harrison, Haye looked like a lost dog in the wilderness during the first 2 rounds til he said "now").

    Haye would get sparked by Adamek.
     
  9. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Adamek is no bite and no bark.

    get it right
     
  10. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    You do realize by this you are condemning Adamek's fight. If losing to McBride is so bad that it plummets the HW division into even greater lows what does that tell you? It's a totally disgraceful fight, worse than Audley Harrison. Title or no title its a terrible, terrible fight with no meaning. There is no defence for Haye for fighting Harrison, he's been endlessly criticized for it and rightly so, but that doesn't make this any better either.

    As for your last comment, going by Adamek's fights with Michael Grant and Arreola where hwa s ahurt, and a very basic knowledge of styles, I'd suggest you're probably very wrong about that. Adamek is an upright fighter with a poor defence, how you come to the conclusion that is the ideal style to beat a mover with speed and power I've no idea. These are polar opposite styles that are extremely easy to read.
     
  11. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    If your trying to defend Adamek's opponents of late then your deluding yourself. Haye fought a mandatory in Ruiz. The Harrison fight was a disgrace but let's face it Adamek should fight Audley next and get another payday in he's been heading down that route. I never said i wish he gets KO'd i said i wouldn't moan if he did.

    I thought the point of being a contender was to work way up the rankings not down? Well done to him for getting a fight with a Klitschko. My point about Haye was to do with beating his last 3 opponents nothing to do with Haye making a fight with a Klit. He is a joke for his behavior as well but he gets stick and Adamek seems to pass under radar of criticism. Least fight someone decent....McBride couldn't even win Prizefighter ffs.

    Ps. Haye would beat Fat Chris and he'd beat Tomasz and then get him to do some roofing on his place out in Cyprus.
     
  12. KillerDeluxe

    KillerDeluxe Guest

    It just tells me that a top ranked contender lost to a 1 hit wonder journeyman.

    Umm, yes it does. Harrison was a TITLE DEFENSE. McBride is a stay busy/tune up. Huge difference. McBride is at the same level as Audley is. But it doesn't matter, cause Adamek has more fight in him. Its funny watching all these posts praising Haye as the next Lennox or somthing, whilst he isn't even close to being it. Haye is a mere puppet, and his **** talking has brainwashed the British boxing fans.

    A ideal mover with speed and power? Adamek moves more in the ring than Haye does. Where was his speed in the John Ruiz fight? where was his speed in the Harrison fight? You talking after the fact where he said "now", tho right?

    anyways this dicussion is boring, i feel sif im talking to a wall / in a pool surrounded by David Haye nay nay sniffers. Good day and have fun with that David Haye poster on your wall.
     
  13. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    :lol::patsch You have no idea what you're talking about man. No idea at all. You think because you're in the Brit forum everybody loves Haye. That's why you've come in here all riled up looking to score points.

    NEWSFLASH: Most of this forum dislike Haye, for the same reasons the rest of the world does. There is no defending how long he's taken to fight Klitschko, or his fight against Audley Harrison. For that, he's lost a lot of love and respect.

    Now, none of this means fighting Kevin McBride is acceptable. What Haye does will not legitimize this epic mismatch. And its not just McBride either, its not a one off, Maddalone and Grant were average at best opponents and I'm being kind there.

    I'm not even going to bother getting into Adamek/Haye again because there is really no point. You're in that type of mindset where you're assuming people love Haye. You ought to look closer to home for nuthuggery, you ride the dick of any Polish fighter and you well know it. So coming in here like that is extremely weak and everyone will see through it.
     
  14. slapbangwhallop

    slapbangwhallop The Sweet Scientist Full Member

    15,873
    13
    Oct 13, 2007
    really?
     
  15. Big Dunk

    Big Dunk Rob Palmer Full Member

    13,522
    0
    Oct 25, 2010
    some of you lot need to actually read the article where slap all but says McBride is talking ****.