Very good or great? Volume 4: Chris Eubank

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boxed Ears, Mar 27, 2011.


  1. Turner72

    Turner72 Member Full Member

    172
    6
    Oct 31, 2010
    If ever a fighter benefitted from the proliferation of world titles, it's Eubank. If not for the creation of the WBO, would Eubank have even become a world champion?
     
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,759
    10,131
    Jul 28, 2009
    I don't know, do you favor him over Galvano, Van Horn, Barkley, Cordoba, Little, Liles...? Any of those?
     
  3. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    I'd say he's a great.
     
  4. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    Yeah?
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,042
    12,942
    Jan 4, 2008
    Eubanks was skilled and had some very nice defensive moves. MW was quite stacked with technicians back then. Hagler pretty recently retired, McCallum and Kalambay still around, and Jones and Hopkins just around the corner. Eubanks is not up with them skillwise, I'd say, but makes up a very respectable second tier of slicksters of the era.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,042
    12,942
    Jan 4, 2008

    So Benn landed a fair minus amount of clean punches you mean?

    McCallum landed far more accurate and hurtful punches on Watson. It's not even comparable. He took Watson apart while Eubank just rocked him a bit on a couple of occassions, in a fight I think Watson won.
     
  7. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009
    I'd argue, but I have never ****ing heard of him.
     
  8. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Eubank was very good but he had way too many moments where he stood back and admired his work, rather than finish the job.

    Too much gloating.
     
  9. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010

    :lol:yeah that was an odd one.
     
  10. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    McCallum landed a lot of body shots and threw a lot upstairs landing one often, but Eubank was was landing 3-4 on the spin regularly.
     
  11. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    And hard head shots

    Mike had a lot more punches blocked than Eubank did
     
  12. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    Eubank could be beautiful to watch at times and some of the defensive maneuvers he would pull off were very impressive. but those moments of technical brilliance would be followed by sloppiness and other baffling moves. he sometimes looked like he slacked with his punching technique as well. would half-ass his combinations sometimes.

    very good fighter but definitely not great.
     
  13. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    When he threw his punches tightly he looked really really good - terrific stiff jab, terrific sneak right, terrific short uppercut, the flashiest of flurries

    But yes there was no consistency - seemed to produce something impressive but then admire his work and not follow-up with near the same quality. The exception when he didn't seem to lose focus once was the first fight with Benn
     
  14. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    I agree with that. he threw some beautiful uppercuts in that fight
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,042
    12,942
    Jan 4, 2008
    That would be because he threw many more. But the main thing here is that he landed far more telling blows.