Do you think is reasonable to suspect on hopkins?

bald head dick just a ***** ass hater

 

This is so ******ed.

Why stop the stupidity there. How about I don't approve of your lifestyle and need you to take random blood test leading up to the fight to make sure you are clean of any disease. Its my life and health on the line and if we both get cut you'll be bleeding all over the open cut.

This ****ing bull about PED making people better boxers. What makes you a better boxer is avoiding the punch while hitting the other guy. There is no ****ing drug in the world that will do that for you. Vargas have tried, Mosley have tried, Toney tried and it didn't do **** for them.

 

bald head dick wastes its time writing, don't even need to read any of its bs, just respond with a bald head dick just a ***** as hater, nuff said, folks here know wassup, unless its vlade divac

 

yes thats why he wants to get under his skin to edge him mentally and hype the fight, thats really all there is to it.
Hopkins is doing it probably because he is just epic and if he wanted testing he should have asked for it before:thumbsup
So if its too expensive then its pointless, its possible to avoid if they really want to cheat then, it will only be used as a tactic in negotiations or to downgrade performances of boxers.

 

They already do pathogen testing.

No, stamina makes you a better Boxer or do you disagree?

 

:|:|:|

 

y even go back and forth with the bald head dick, bald head dick just a ***** ass hater, aint goin listen to your good knowledge

 

They test way before the fight. That doesn't do **** for the months afterward.
And you ain't going to detect disease without blood test.

Stamina does not make you a better boxer. Having better stamina then your opponent means you are more physically fit. Boxing skill is learn and to degree a God given talent. No pills in the world is going to make you a better boxer. You can get physically fit but it will not translate to boxing skills.

 

yeah there is no point in discussing things with him it seems, ow well, gl convincing him

 

I'm not sure really. One interesting thing though, based on circumstances Bhop is more likely on peds than Pacquiao but Bhop isn't getting half the criticism Pacquiao is getting when both refused testing. What gives?

 

I DONT CARE how old/young you are, or how good you eat, if u have shown any improvement OR NOT............... BUT IF YOu don't want to take a test, be it in the name of the sport, or for the fans, or more so for the $lucrative$$ part of it, when all other athletes can do it (Olympics and everywhere else), then u r most certainly hiding something. How difficult can that b for somebody to understand?? It's really frustrating to see the sport that you love is so full of ppl with such limited intellectual capacity...:hey. just joking... Then again, no wonder the WWE have so many fans that believe all that stupiditythey see on tv. Our sport gets similar by the minute with this kind of nonsense. If u want to watch a non-regulated sport, WWE is the thing 4 you. If u want to be a fan of a serious sport capable of attracting more serious fans, then regulations is the only way to go...

 

Huh? They do a yearly pathogen test and then they do ANOTHER test "close" to the fight. And yes, it is a blood test.

You sound like a moron. Sure, with just skillz you can kick a guys a$$ for 2-4 rounds, but no way in hell can you be sharp no matter what God gave you out of shape. See James Toney. Dude anyone on the level of Hopkins, Pascal, ODLH, Trinidad, hell even Margarito can "Box". They are top level competitors. Margarito can Box a Can and look like Ali.

No Stamina = Poor execution. Period.

 

Nothing to convince me of. That guy's an idiot and you are comparing apples to oranges.

Case A is BEFORE a contract is signed.

Case B is AFTER a contract is signed.

In both Cases the fighters are well within their rights and on the right side of the moral argument. In only one case did the fighter make a commitment THEN raise his objections therefore breaching the contract.

 

why would you say that?