Yeah because to be considered a one armed fighter you can only throw with one hand the entire fight.atsch
yeah because you can't watch the fights and see him throwing a thousand right hooks and jabs, you have to take Freddie's word for it
Yea there were rumors Erik was having personal problems before the Raheem fight and with the bottle too. His wins over Pacman and MAB is stuff of legends. He could box, but loved it how his pride would get the best of him and went to war when he didnt have too. Havent seen so much rage in a fighter since Tyson or Duran.
it was those puffy winning gloves he had to wear, a huge gash over his eye.. BUT, MORALES did EVERYTHING to win the fight. Fair play to him. If not, the greatest fight against Pacquiao. I think Floyd can do something similar but he'll be more careful and not engage.
Dominating? You are so quick to call out how over the top *******s are but you're a PAChater which is on the same exact level. You didn't even watch EM vs PAC 1 if you thought that was a dominant performance. If you really want to see a dominating performance look at PAC and Floyd's last couple of fights...well...For PAC check out all of his fights over the last 4 yrs. That's true domination kid.
Pac had a lot more power behind his punches in the 2nd and 3rd fights. In the first fight Morales was eating some of those power punches like candy. I think Pac underestimated the effect of jumping up to 130 right away against a fighter the caliber of Morales. He had only had three fights at featherweight and then went straight to Morales at Jr Lightweight.
They were live because isn't a complete fighter yet. If they fought the version of Pac now it would be a complete and utter mismatch :deal
Pacman is a warrior on that fight, huge cut on the eye and still coming in. And to the fact that Pacman jump to that weight straight to Morales and not some tune-up. Give the guy some credit *****s.
Did you watch the Arce-Hussein fight? Not shitting at all on the Morales performance but that fight gets little pub because it was undercard. 20 times the excitement the morales-pac fight was. and for it to be on the undercard on PPV. that was one of the best p4p exciting ppvs of all time.:happy
Morales might've beaten Pac but couldn't get back up from Pac's knockdowns unlike the real badass named Juan M. Marquez. But yeah, it was weird seeing Pac get hit so many times in Pac-Morales 1. Pac lost a good amount of blood in that fight and still managed to fight like a wild pitbull.
I had Pacquiao winning this fight. Pacquiao is still undefeated. Pacquiaos two knock out losses are considered amateur fights because he was a teenager fighting great champions.