Why is Calderon being called a quitter while Morales gets a by pass for quitting

Against Pacquiao in the very same 3rd round? Why cause Morales has been a warrior for all his career but that's ok for him to quit but not Calderon if he did quit last night? Why the double the standard? Calderon like Morales was an over the hill fighter. And Calderon was not only an old fighter at 36 years old but damn he was very small and don't have a punch for a stoppage. It's a shame that these type of fans would bash on a fighter that has fought 18 + title fights at his size but yet he gets bashed on cause he wouldn't get up from a hard body shot? But when Morales gets beat up just in the 3rd round and basically quits vs Pacquiao, that's ok? He should get a by pass cause of his past fights?

 

calderun quit before the going got tough, morales was beaten up.

 

It's just trolls being trolls, bro. It feeds from the Mexican/Rican rivalry. Not even worth acknowledging to be honest.

 

Neither fighter should be getting slandered. It's a disgrace. Utter disgrace.

 

You could say the same about Morales look like he was going to quit before the going gets tough.

 

Morales took a beating, and he bascially said "**** I just can't compete with this Filipino" It wasn't like he got hurt and quit. He gave it his all but was outgunned. Pacquiao was an AK47 while Morales was a 22

 

i was just ****in with you you pornstar ******.

neither deserve to be called quitters.

 

Agreed 100%

Both fighters mentioned are warriors. **** what the haters say.

 

Calderon shouldn't have even been in the ring last night. The fight was lost way before the bell rang. No shame in him quitting, the little man was out of his depth, the rematch shouldn't have took place. He knew himself he couldn't win, so taking another gruelling encounter with Segura was pointless.

 

Where you in the ring with him then shut the **** up you moron both fighters should get the utmost respect.

 

WTF? Morales quit in that 3rd fight. Don't try to change history cause he clearly quit pure and simple but i haven't bashed on him because he was an over the hill past his prime fighter that has gave alot of great fights through the years. Calderon may not have given alot of great fights but he was a warrior through the years with all disadvantage he has to indoor with his small size, no pop. I haven't mention about Morales quit vs Pacquiao in the 3rd fight until now cause it's not right that Calderon a little 5'0 warrior gets bashed on last night while Morales gets a heavy by pass. It's not right.

 

Agendas and people not knowing what the **** they are talking about is usually the main culprit.

 

Just like Morales shouldn't take the rubber match vs Pacquiao after what Pacquiao did to him in the rematch in which i bet Morales knew all along he wouldn't win but yet thats ok for you?

 

Calderon being called a quitter makes me ****ing sick. He'd been beaten up in the first fight and, at age 36, he goes in against a younger, stronger, harder-hitting fighter who seemed to have even more of a size advantage this time around - what was anyone really expecting?

Anyone throwing these kind of insults at Calderon can **** right off.

 

Calderon proved his hearth in the first Seigura fight. There are times that you know that there is nothing that you can do like Arguello- Pryor 2 for example so there is no point dying in the ring. It's a shame when the fight is still up for grabs and you quit. Imagine for example Corrales quiting in the first Castillo-Corrales fight