all i ever see on this site is mayweather is undefeated so hes better than pacquiao, alot of people have retired undefeated who are'nt even ATG fact chavez was just an example , what i'm saying is just because someone is undefeated does not mean they are better like people are trying to say
Oh come on. Floyd's resume obviously could/should be better his "0" means miles more than Chavez Jr's does.
LOL 6 Hall of Famers huh? He didn't even beat half of those in there weight divisions, or when they weren't shot. Hatton had to fight at 147 (140 pder), Mosley is straight up shot (and still is even fighting Pac), JMM had to move up practically 2 weight divisions, DLH was a pretty good win though I've never been that high on DLH, Gatti was a glorified bar room brawler who wasn't in Floyd's league, etc The mans record isn't that bad honestly, but it's this whole undefeated thing that Floyd fan's run there mouths about is what's annoying. Calzaghe was undefeated and he beat 2 hall of famers (Jones, and BHOp), he beat Kessler (good fighter), and he beat mini Mike Tyson whom everyone was scared of, Jeff Lacy! (LOL).
To 50% of Floyd's fans, and Floyd himself...Yes, that 0 is all that makes him great. Sad too because if Floyd were actually active, have fought the fights people wanted to see (most fights he could have won) then he'd get more praise than Pac. *EVEN IF* he lost a fight or two in between!