Why does Oscar get away with cherry picking Pac?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FORMIDABLE, Apr 7, 2011.


  1. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Just because he sufferred enough embarrassment getting his ass whooped, doesn't change the fact he was a jr middleweight who chased down a fight with a guy who'd had just one fight at lightweight.

    And he did this when Margarito was fresh off the Cotto win and would have been as equally as big a fight.

    He made the much smaller Pac come up 13lbs from his previous fight, while Oscar only had to lose 3lbs. This has to be the biggest attempted cherry pick of all-time. As great as the stupidity of the nitwits today who like to claim Pac cherry picked Oscar.
     
  2. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    If he had won he would have received hatred like floyd got for beating marquez, dont forget he also drained b-hop yet hopkins is the only guy to knock him out but nowadays people say he made Oscar move up to knock him out. 155/6 isnt that far from the weight he was good at.
     
  3. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    :lol: Who on earth claims that Manny cherry picked Oscar?

    I'd answer your question with a question. Why should a man which a recent record as chequered as Oscar, coming off an underwhelming performance against a fighter who was effectively a super-featherweight be aiming to fight the best (around his weight like Margarito, who fought a man he should have pulverised and got beat anyway) instead of using what financial pull he has in his latter days?

    Oscar wasn't among the best at that point, his recent record at the time showed that, he went for the biggest money fight he could make and that was the pound for pound king. The best should be fighting the best, but if some dinosaur of the sport who still brings bigger figures than the other fighters wants to fight him. Take the fight.
     
  4. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    That's right. Oscar had fought at 160 the fight before against Sturm, but he made Hopkins fight a few lbs below that. That would be like Pac fighting Margo at 154, then making Martinez fight him at 150-152. Imagine the hate Pac would get then. Although I give Oscar the benefit there being the smaller guy and looking pudgy against Sturm and not carrying the weight well at 160.

    The Pac fight should be unforgivable though. Ultimate cherry pick
     
  5. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    I think if Oscar had won people would have bitched about him not fighting cotto or margarito, I think if he had won he would have fought hatton at 147 as well.
     
  6. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Because people know that, that was just a "money fight".

    DLH is PPV figure, and he's just milking what's left of his stature.:D
     
  7. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    the margarito fight would have done 1 million buys for sure, as much as the Pac fight or more. hell there wouldn't have been many mexicans not wanting to see margarito chomp de la hoya to bits, even in the US. what he did previously in his career does not excuse his actions in cherry picking Pac. he saw it as a cheap way to end his career by beating a pound for pound fighter. only reason he is excused now is because he looked so pathetic in losing
     
  8. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    I'm not in the negotions so I can't comment on this as a whole, but the guys at Top Rank and Golden Boy recognised that the Manny fight was the most lucrative fight. de la Hoya had the star power and Manny had the accomplishment, so from that angle you can see the business sense quite clearly. Saying Margarito would have done x number of buys may very well have been true, but the fact remains it is speculative. Manny-de la Hoya made something like 1.4/1.5m buys I think.

    Oscar wasn't at the stage in his career where he should have been fighting the best, the Forbes fight was one of the most underwhelming fights that I've been pumped up for before hand from a personal stand point. He decided that he wanted Manny, who could have fought Guzman or Campbell or whoever else. Instead the fight with Oscar was made and Oscar was favoured to win, and people did accuse him of cherry picking. By this stage in his career though he was a part time fighter who anyone with a right mind wouldn't have considered among the best.

    Manny did the right thing, he took the fight and became immortal (although I think he already was). Margarito sat on the sidelines and cried about not being able to fighter de la Hoya (who wasn't among the best) so Margarito in turned cherry picked Mosley (who also wasn't considered among the best) because it made financial sense to fight in LA. Both mens decisions were bad ones, Margarito's more so because he destroyed his rep. de la Hoya just damaged his but walked away with a massive amount of cash.

    I'd agree with the use of the phrase cherry picking if Oscar had beat Mayweather and then come of a solid KO win over Forbes, but...he didn't.
     
  9. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    :deal This
     
  10. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    for Pac it was just a money fight, one he couldn't win and people were accusing Roach of cashing out on him.

    For Oscar, of course money had a lot to do with it, but he would've gone straight to the most popular fighter Hatton if it was the sole purpose of it. It was also about picking the best p4p fighter he could beat to reclaim some of his lost glory. didn't he say in one of the 24/7 shows he would become p4p #1 again if he beat Pac?
     
  11. FORMIDABLE

    FORMIDABLE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,664
    6
    Jan 12, 2010
    Oscar was competitive with Floyd. He didn't look great against Forbes and got tagged abit, but he shut him out. He was still seen as a top fighter, even if he wasn't ranked due to being a part time fighter. I remember many opinions on here being that he would whoop Margarito, even after Margo-Cotto. Before the Pac fight Oscar was hated on for seeking the fight and cherry picking Pac. After the fight it all disappeared when everyone felt sorry him. it wasn't just seen as a money fight for him, that he got a pass for it. That's not what happened.
     
  12. LancsTerrible

    LancsTerrible Different Forms of Game. Full Member

    8,657
    14
    Aug 1, 2010
    Unfortunately we aren't going to know what Team Oscar, Team Pacquiao, or Arum or any of those other guys thought in private. Whether Team Oscar genuinely believed that taking on Manny would be the easier way of getting back to the top, and thus chose him. I, personally, wouldn't call it a cherry pick just because for me it implies that someone on the top (based on merit) chooses the easy option. I don't think Oscar was on top picking a guy below him, I think he was using his financial weight as a way of becoming/staying relevant within boxing and making a shed load of money at the same time (which has always been the Oscar/Arum way of thinking in all their collaborations).

    I don't think Oscar deserves to be chastised too much even if people do think he was cherry picking, at least not as long as people have a go at Margarito for picking Mosley (which I don't think I've seen anyone do even though Mosley was seen meat for the meat grinder) or the return of the prodigal "P4P1" taking on "numbero uno" in his return fight (which to be fair Floyd gets a lot of stick for).
     
  13. pahapoisu

    pahapoisu Superman! Full Member

    7,824
    2
    Jul 5, 2010
    He didnt. He got ****ed up good. Neither man gets the any credit.
     
  14. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    Pac deserves credit for going from 130 to 147 in the same year and retire Oscar, that oscar ****ed up is his problem. I still believe it takes balls to make such a jump, and come into the ring 100% ready and in great shape.And eventhough it doesnt do much for pac on here we all know that this fight made him into a superstar boxer.
     
  15. mRD

    mRD vagabond Full Member

    578
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    No I didn't think so. decades from now when they open the history books, the fact remains that the much bigger guy ODH call out PAC, a midget coming from a several lower weight div all on account of money and attempt to bring back some lost glory. He paid a heavy price though as he got his ass whopped in an embarassing fashion. Right now, however, the world is full of haters and fanboys who fanaticaly dismiss Pac's accomplishment in destroying a much bigger guy in ODH. Pac has now getting a lot of discredit for beating a drained and dried ODH. But these same people seem to ignore the fact that ODH fights above the WW div, and the guy knew so well he'll be fighting with some level of disadvantage. He and the haters didn't ***** before the fight about his weight and now, ODH is all about weight drain and ****. Give me break