One of the most common errors here is that a fighters stamina and chin are discussed as purely physical attributes, when technique plays almost as big a role. Foreman is a very good example. In his comeback his chin and stamina seemed to have actually improved since his physical prime. This is of course because he was more relaxed in the ring, paced himself better, had better balance and a tighter defence. What other examples are there of fighters whose defencies in these areas mostly are down to technical factors?
Totally agree, man. Keeping your chin down makes you that much harder to knock out. If he didn't hang himself out, Hamed may never have been dropped. Miguel Cotto used to fade late because of how tense he was early, and how bad his weight cut was. Chris Byrd rolled from side to side and back with punches, taking a critical amount off of them that enabled him to take some powerful heavyweights best shots.
I agree that chin is not only a physical attribute. If you stand there shut your eyes and take a punch then it is probably a physical attribute only.
Yep. But then it's not gonna matter since you'll be KO'd regardless. That young Foreman was so hard to knock out despite his lacking defense and balance just speaks volumes about what beast the man was in terms of strength. Ali's legendary chin was very much down to him being able to roll with most punches. If not for that ability there's no way he would have survived against Shavers for example. Likewise, his ability to move and punch a lot had much to do with how relaxed he was.
three things that aid a chin: smarts, heart and conditioning. when people talk about the 'best chins', i tend to think about the attribute in isolation. in that sense, i think the ability to take a punch is something you're born with.
the reason technically skilled fighters don't tire easily? probably because, most of the time, someone who has trained hard enough to hone their all-round technique, will have also put some thought into how to pace themselves and how to recover when in trouble. fighters who have good technique (using the term in the broadest way here) are usually relatively economical with their movements too, both when throwing punches and evading them. i'd also say that they tend to land a higher percentage of their punches. missing over and over again is sapping, physically and mentally.
That's one part of it, but far from the whole story. A while back I sparred with a pretty well muscled guy who's probably around 190-220 lbs, but who had very little skill. I tapped him lightly on the chin with a left hook and since he was wide open and didn't see it coming he almost went down and had to take a break. Had I put my all into it the guy would have been laid out cold and probably suffered a concussion (or worse). Had he been skilled and experienced he would not even have blinked by that left I tapped him with and would probably have withstood it even had I put my all in it. The difference is huge.
when i say smarts, i'm talking about ring generalship, concentration, technique etc. my first response was pretty glib.
yeah. there's obviously a lot to it. would you say, though, that the fundamental ability to take a punch, removing all of these other factors, is something that you're born with?
To a degree, yes. Freakish strength like Foreman's as well as the shape and thickness of the skull etc are attributes you are born with.
i always thought that hagler, for example, just happened to have crazy bone density in his face, and head in general. of course he had all of the supporting attributes, but i reckon he would have been a pretty solid journeyman fighter if you had removed his other abilities, based on his chin alone.