The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    If you study it a bit more, the poster claims that Pac fans "act like" Pac inventented philanthropy, You see this is also my pet hate, When ppl group fans under the banner of ONE opinion and try to pass that as gospel for all those fans, If you look at esb as a whole you would see that most trolls will use this type of Rebuttal, specially against pac fans.

    Hence when you notice a rebuttal like this, its easy to assume that it was posted by a troll/hater in general. So we can argue that the poster was easily confused by my question but with reference to fake $$ being given and the thread being about Mayweather fans vs Pac fans I assumed that he would be smart enough to assume this question did not encompass the whole history of Boxers..

    You notice how he assumed that I thought way?? It would be stupid to assume that pac invented philanthropy.

    In summary Pac fans react to haters/trolls this way as a result of the constant "you dont know **** bout boxing, Your a ******* you dont know ****, when did you start following boxing? , Pac is ducker , fights weight drained shot fighters type of responses that you continually get here in esb..all responses from small minded haters who cant stand a little asian dominating and scaring the **** out of their favorite son

    There is no logic to discrediting all of Pacs fight.. but there is logic and fun in making some posters see the idiocy of their post. (Pac haters/trolls that is)
     
  2. nuketurnal

    nuketurnal N-Bomb Full Member

    2,090
    0
    Apr 24, 2010
    They hate him because they think he's a hypocrite.
     
  3. evilsherwin

    evilsherwin Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    Really... I find that reasoning strange.
     
  4. Big George

    Big George Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,867
    20
    Jan 16, 2011
    Dude you really ain't that important my man. I mean all your post really suck and you give absolutely no insight at all when it comes to actual boxing. So, I tend to wonder,"why the hell do you and cats like you come and blog on boxing sights?" Well it's easy to figure out. 1. You have no life. 2. Nobody you know at all even likes your ass. 3. The only women you've ever had is a date with Rosie Red Palm or a blowup doll. 4. And at the end of the day this is the closest you'll ever get to having any kind of recognition. And man, dam that is truly sad yo. Dam..... and the attention you get is all negative from what I've read. Dude it's a BOXING SITE! IT'S NOT 5TH GRADE MY MAN! Whatever frustrations you're having dude you can channel in some positive energy to help yourself find solutions that can help you be a lot more content with who you are. Because personally my man, I don't think you like yourself. and at the end of the day, this is what you show us.
     
  5. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    He can fight your grandma and it'll still be exciting..
     
  6. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    A-****ing-men. :good

    Floyd plays stupid all the time and contradicts himself, yet it's ok for him?

    Are you denying the fact that he beat his baby momma and threaten to kill his kids?

    :lol::lol::rofl:rofl

    So you're another one of those guys who thinks Floyd ruins every person he fights? Explain how. You'll probably reply without even responding to the question and talk about some off the wall ****..

    See the difference is, Pacquiao changed, Mayweather can't or won't.. America views Pacquiao as a humble guy as the Philippines view him as a savior.. America views Mayweather as a piece of ****.. Pacquiao admitted his wrong doings whereas Mayweather can't or won't..





    Too much to read so I'll stop here.. Anyways, Mayweather fans are some of the most hypocritical people on this board.. They talk mad **** about Pacquiao just because of his fans and because he fights people that Mayweather has already fought? Why the need for **** talking? If a pac fan pisses you off, then talk **** to him, not about Pacquiao.. Pacquiao is one of the most humble and exciting boxers today, if you hate him, you're not a fan of boxing..

    On the other hand, it's easy to hate Mayweather because he's a arrogant and racist piece of ****.. How can it be so easy to support him and his actions? What has Pacquiao, HIMSELF, actually done for Mayweather fans to hate him?
     
  7. Sweet Jones

    Sweet Jones Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,672
    6
    May 24, 2007
    Apparently, reading is not your strong suit. I CLEARLY stated ‘a segment of Pac Fans’. I didn’t group all Pac Fans, YOU did.

    YOU inject Pac’s charity work as if that is somehow special or separates him from other boxers. When it gets pointed out that numerous boxers are equally as engaged in assisting their communities, you then insinuate that you were are comparing Pac to Mayweather.

    Which leads to the next logical question: who really gives a dayum if Pac is (allegedly) more charitable than Mayweather, and why inject that in the first place? What does that have to do with, you know, BOXING? IMHO, it’s obvious that you thought that served as some kind of shot at Mayweather. Which again, only proves the point about that segment of Pac Fans here.

    The ultimate irony is not only was your point useless, it's WRONG. Mayweather has been shown on TV giving away food and money and it has been widely reported that he fairly known for his largess in Vegas.

    So either when you made your ‘comparison’ you, a) didn’t know that, which calls into question your knowledge or, b) you DID know, yet thought it would be cute to talk slick, which calls into question your motives.

    Which is it?
     
  8. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,966
    23,917
    Feb 19, 2007
    i give to charity, of course its not as much as floyd gives as he has more money and i cant compare. floyd gives to charity, of course its not as much as pac has as he doesnt do it as a pr stunt and floyd cant compare.
     
  9. Sweet Jones

    Sweet Jones Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,672
    6
    May 24, 2007
    Interesting.

    Out of curiosity, what makes you believe Mayweather's charitable contributions are a 'PR stunt' whereas Pacquiao, the guy with political aspirations and whose image is one of the most well managed in professional sports right now, is not a 'PR stunt'?

    Thank you in advance for your reponse.
     
  10. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,966
    23,917
    Feb 19, 2007
    the character (or lack of) floyd has shown in his many interviews, his narcissistic personality and obvious upbringing by moraly corrupt relatives, all make me believe his turkey giveaways are just another chance to stroke his own ego. his fans dont pay his bill, remember.
    all the things floyd lacks in character, pac has displayed in abundance, not just with lip service, but actual acts of true charity that will have a long lasting positive effect on all his beneficiaries.
    two totally different personalities that do things for different reasons. i have experience with both personality types within my own family so i understand what to expect from them and why.
     
  11. Sweet Jones

    Sweet Jones Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,672
    6
    May 24, 2007
    Interesting.

    I can't think of anything more 'narcissistic' than starring as an action hero in movies when you have little or no acting chops.

    I can't think of anything more narcissistic than holding political office while maintaining your full time career (boxing) which takes away months at a time from the people you are supposed to be advocating for.

    I can't think of anything more 'narcissistic' than believing the world wants to hear you sing (in an extremely mediocre fashion).

    I can't think of anything more 'narcissistic' than naming your punches (i.e. 'Manila Ice')

    And speaking of 'upbringing by moraly corrupt relatives', what it not Pacquiao whose father left the family because he was living with another woman?

    Seems to me that there are alot of similarities in 'personality' and 'upbringing' between the two. Yet one gets lauded for his 'character' while the other gets derided.

    Does that not seem strange to you? :think
     
  12. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,966
    23,917
    Feb 19, 2007
    well if you cant think of anything more narcissistic than starring in a movie they offer you because it sells on your name and not your acting talent, then your ability to think is severely limited. i can think of a thousand things off the top of my head.

    if his boxing career limits his ability to perform his political duties then im sure he wont be reelected. right now you know about as much as i do about these limitations, which is nothing.

    if nobody wanted to hear manny sing, nobody would show up to his show, simple. william hung made a nice chunk of change and it wasnt due to his narcissism or good singing.

    where did you get that manny named that punch? not that it proves any level of narcissism, just curious.

    he may have, i dont know. his fathers antics arent displayed weekly on video or framed in police blotters for me to make that conection.

    the similarities you speak of can apply to just about anybody, which analyzed in truth and not defence, arent similar at all.
     
  13. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Ohh **** son!:rofl:lol::rofl:lol:
     
  14. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    35,966
    23,917
    Feb 19, 2007
    lol, im surprised another member of the ******* demographic would find that funny. your mamas baby daddy wouldnt find it so funny.
     
  15. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    One day man!:good
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.