I was discussing Erik Morales last night with a friend. We watched the first Morales and pac fight and i said this was Morales at his peak. My friend said no, on his day he was even better than that. Would you say that is a fair statement, or could Morales have been even better that night?
i think his peak was before the 1st barrera fight the pacquiao was his last great performance though........so far()
Morales just wasn't the same, period. It's stupid people trying to put percentages on boxers i.e Morales at 80% :-(
Peak, no doubt. He was almost peak in the 2nd fight as well. However here in ESB, all fights are out of peak once they lose. Every single one of the fighters... There is hardly any great fighter beating another prime great fighter because once the other lose, he is automatically not prime.
Some of you are Sofa King ******ed. Morales had entered the midst of a 5 fight losing streak, the worst in his career and retired right after that....................the very definition of a fighter past his prime and some of you still claim he was at his peakatsch
That was his last great performance, but he was coming off of a (very close) loss to MAB. Was he peak? No, but he wasn't shot (yet) either.
I think his peak was around the 1st Barrerra fight. The Pac fight was his final hurrah, one last big performance in a great career.