Sky turns down Klitschko-Haye for Khan - then turns down Khan? What's going on?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Apr 10, 2011.


  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    1,761
    Nov 20, 2007
    So what's the story here dear British posters? Klitschko-Haye was a no-go for Sky Sports PPV in April because of a then-unknown Khan defense took the spot, but now Sky backs out of the Khan-McCloskey card - how is that even possible under signed contracts?

    Can anyone explain in details what is going on?
     
  2. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,209
    6,764
    Jul 21, 2009
    Sky = dumbest and most amateurish network after HBO.
     
  3. Dio

    Dio Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,437
    2
    Jun 21, 2010
    They turned it down cuz Tyson fury was off the card and now no one will buy the PPV :(
     
  4. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    they sound more and more like HBO everyday
     
  5. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Apparently the bouts that they wanted to pack the card with and make it attractive/sellable, havn't come off.
     
  6. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    these networks kill me... they dont like the undercards so they deprive us of all fights...

    I know most of us as hard core boxing fans love the undercards... but for most people... its all about the "main event"... to not show a main event because the undercard is not what they wanted is a joke
     
  7. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Maybe, yes . . . but the question remains . . . can they do this under contract?
     
  8. Those fights are too expensive.
     
  9. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Yeah but they expect people to pay 20 euro approx for a PPV

    3 big fights...


    2 got cancelled

    they said they will put it on regular Sky subscription TV

    Khan said no and went to prime time

    Khan wants extra PPV dollars no matter what

    Greed :good
     
  10. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    72
    Oct 28, 2004
    Most undercards are outright horrendous, unfortunately.

    The last HBO card was dope all around, I loved it.
     
  11. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    action heros was value for money
     
  12. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    WAIT!!!
    I didnt know that...... now I kinda blame Khan.... based on the Thread, I thought they just cancelled showing his fight.

    GREED..... you said right buddy.... GREED
     
  13. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    yep pure greed Khans used to seeing millions for every fight and against some unworthy opponents at that

    hes well overpaid and is happy to hold his countrymen to ransom each and every time
     
  14. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006


    The brothers have never really liked PPV... yes they could make more... but in there words "we are making enough, we want our fans and boxing fans to see our fights"

    Like last night... I wanted to see Adamak.... but sorry, im not spending $30.00 to see that fight..... I wish more top guys would stop with the PPV
     
  15. Blockbuster8787

    Blockbuster8787 Member Full Member

    142
    0
    Apr 9, 2011
    They didn't turn down Klitschko/Haye, it was simply a matter of Khan being given the slot first.

    As for Khan/McCloskey, that was down to guys pulling out. Sky can't show a card which has had so many cancellations. Then it got pushed to Sky Sports 3 but then Khan's team decided to be greedy. Nothing to do with Sky.