Amir Khan/Paul McCloskey To Be Shown on Primetime - Confirmed

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Lazarus, Apr 8, 2011.


  1. ScubaSteve

    ScubaSteve Dwylo o Garreg Full Member

    3,128
    0
    Nov 17, 2010
    Is that where the 50 buys came from? :think
     
  2. Decy

    Decy Barely Coherent Full Member

    3,876
    154
    Oct 23, 2006
    Simple they are thinking bollocks to the Khans he is not a big moneymaker for Sky so they lose nothing.
     
  3. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    I don't care about this fight, but if Sky are saying no to Khan/Bradley, then they can **** off.

    Who the **** do the expect Khan to face for it to be on PPV? Klitschko?!? Pacquiao?!?

    **** off Sky.
     
  4. tazz1234321

    tazz1234321 Active Member Full Member

    720
    0
    Apr 11, 2010
    Your stupid if you really think this, do you really think Sky would choose Khan vs TBA (at the time) over Haye vs Klitschko???
     
  5. GrizzyBeard

    GrizzyBeard Guest

    If there where only 50 bars in ireland this place might be a bit more peacefull.

    Your probably right though. Do primetime even have the rights to broadcast in Ireland? Any chance RTE will get the irish rights?
     
  6. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Looking onto the better side of it....

    It's £9.95
     
  7. WelshDevilRob

    WelshDevilRob Active Member Full Member

    1,167
    0
    Nov 12, 2006
    Its not nonsense and if you actually kept up with negotiations etc as they progress you would realise this, instead you disagree with anything that doesn't conform to your own blinkered views. Open your eyes, sonny.
     
  8. alba

    alba Guess who? Full Member

    11,185
    2
    Jun 13, 2008
    your talking aobut other posters over reacting ...but to say you dont care when you ve doen a thread about it and upadated it everyday etc is a bit silly is it not? also unfortuantly khan is not the superstar he likes to think ,that is obvious if his ppv buy rate were decent then they wouldent have had this problem :roll:

    sky are part of the problem ,.but khan is the major player in this problem
     
  9. tazz1234321

    tazz1234321 Active Member Full Member

    720
    0
    Apr 11, 2010
    Where did you get that from? £9.95 is ok i guess if they show a good amount of the undercard.
     
  10. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Khan vs Bradley doesn't really ''grab'' anyone outside the boxing fans though, certainly not in the way the Hatton/Mayweather fight did.

    Perhaps Sky have realised the error of their ways and are determined now to utilise PPV for big fights only. Khan vs bums like Prescott and journeymen like ***an shouldn't be on PPV.

    Khan vs Bradley isn't likely to be a barn burner, it won't sell and Khan probably gets beaten. Not a brilliant investment from Sky, is it?
     
  11. boxing4eva

    boxing4eva Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,382
    0
    Dec 3, 2009
    Laz, why should SKY put a fight on PPV, at 4.30am.. against a guy which has no cross over appeal, and an event which has lost a significant amount of it's promotional build up from the Khan's no being on SS for the Mccloskey fight.

    It would not sell unless attached to another event earlier in the evening.
     
  12. WelshDevilRob

    WelshDevilRob Active Member Full Member

    1,167
    0
    Nov 12, 2006
    Yeah, not sure whats gone on there and hopefully it all gets resolved so Froch gets a bigger TV audience in the UK.
     
  13. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    Prescott and Maidana would do better numbers than Bradley. Styles make fights and Bradley's last performance in a 'big fight' was a shocker.

    Who is buying Khan v Bradley at 4am. Nobody!

    I'm sure that will grab the attention of the masses who dont know primetime exists lol.
     
  14. chatty

    chatty Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,413
    1,067
    Aug 18, 2009
    Nope i think they wanted both, they had already commited to Khan at the time and told Haye to find another date (royal wedding and ****). If khan hadnt been on sky then Haye Klit could have negotiated for a date easier as April would be less stacked.

    At the end of the day i dont care no more cause the big fight got made, Im not too fussed about this khan fight but would like to see him V Bradley so hope this dosnt **** that about.

    Im not saying its solely skys fault, theyve just been sucked into the **** world of negotiated ego driven boxing fights but they could have handled things better.

    If they hadnt made a shambles from Harrison/Haye I dont think this would have been half as probmatic. They need to make clear what they expect in future. Either a massive fight or a name with a good card. Failing that it wont be on PPV - that way the boxer/his team cant complain if the PPv falls through having been aware ahead of time
     
  15. Pa_nash

    Pa_nash Member Full Member

    478
    0
    Feb 20, 2009
    Doubt it. There isn't much interest in this fight in Ireland outside of boxing fans, as far as i can tell.