Void believes that Mosely is not the same fighter he was and that he is over-the-hill. Did Mosley agree to throw the fight to get Void to sign?
mosley is 38 and has not fought for over a year. i just wish he can land a lucky punch on floyd's big mouth to finally laid that overrated zero to rest and subsequently make himself more marketable than floyd jr. and sr.
I'm avoiding nothing you ****ing anus, the two best opponents that Shane has beaten are Oscar and Margarito. But Oscar was waaaaaaaaaaay better than Margarito, and Shane was clearly better when he beat Oscar. Who was the best opponent that Morales beat? Pacquiao. But Morales was better in the late 90s/early 2000s than he was in 2005. You're the thickest **** on this forum bar none.
Mayweather can never win. "Fight a legit Welter in Mosley; the true champ!" Now no one gives a damn since the fight has been signed. I cant wait personally.
And your a biased dip****. Next question. What would be his worst loss at 147?? Would it be the one sided shalacking he took from Forrest when by your estimation he was waaaaaaaaaaay better or the close decision loss to Cotto? It remains to be seen how bad Mosley has slipped. If he beats Mayweather you'll probably disappear from this site. Noone is suggesting he has the physical reflexes of a 28 year old, but he is still performing quite well on the top level of 147 and thats been my point all along. Its kind of funny that your using wins to point out how bad hes slipped, especially considering he had his worse one sided loss when he was supposedly way better, and had his most dominant stoppage win just recently against a guy everyone avoided and ranked highly until he was stopped by Mosley. Now hes a one dimensional worthless fighter that was perfectly setup for Mosleys style. You are trying to make this a Mayweather arguement and I really dont care if Mayweather wins or loses nor do I think Mosley was that far better of a fighter 10 years ago, and his record certainly shows that to be true.
The Mosley of the De La Hoya, Shannon Taylor, Adrian Stone fights is at least two level above the Mosley that lost to Cotto and beat Margarito.
Personally, I thought Floyd would WHIP Shane's ass no matter when their fight took place. Shane has always been "ALL OFFENSE". Floyd has and always had WAY TOO MUCH Diversity and Variety for Shane. Shane was a serious TOP-SHELF, ELITE-LEVEL fighter 8-10 years ago...But what still stands out in my mind is watching how terrible Mosley looked against Vargas (first fight) and Mayorga....Fights in which Mosley was trailing on at least one judges scorecard in each of those fights. And not to mentioned getting OUTBOXED BY MIGUEL COTTO. I think people have such an enormous amount of HATE for Floyd Mayweather that they fail to see how good he really is. So with all that being said...Mosley is not the fighter he once was, but I still thought Mayweather would beat him back in '99 and 2000.
More boring drivel from you. How interesting. If you took a blind, deaf, senile rat into a laboratory and showed it Mosley vs De La Hoya 1, then showed it any of Mosley's recent fights, including Margarito, even the vermin would see that Mosley was faster, sharper, busier, and all round better back then. But that doesn't fit in with your usual obsessive pro-Floyd agenda, so keep on hammering away trying (and failing miserably as usual) to convince anyone. And again...
Why don't you quote when I predicted a draw vs Shane and Mora ? or when i said Dawson would lose to Pascal or Lemiuex KTFO by Rubio ? or make posts stating UW was a lock to make sweet 16 or bengals ravens game.. bold predictionsthat I actually started threads about. I was wrong with Shane and Froch vs AA but nobody is perfect and now that I know the little Mosley trick of him being 1/5 of himself off long layoffs it all makes sense.
There were many fans that wanted this fight far more than the Pacquiao fight because Mosley is a "real welterweight!!!", as soon as it was signed the list of excuses were endless.