So you admit you don't have that information?? I thought you would have the letter Ketchel wrote to "Pete the Goat" since you claim you have letters and telegrams.
I do have that letter. And supposedly you do to. Why dont we each send a copy to someone on here and they can see which one of us is full of ****. Let me guess. You want to send it to FistsforK...
What appears to me, is that Klompton has had it in for Ketchel for quite a while. He couldn't wait to write negativity about him or his book. Like I've said, Klompton's on here ranting about someone else's book, when he could be working on his own. He calls him names, Ketchel hardly ever calls Klompton out of his name. I've read where he's called him a fool, and a crybaby, that's pretty much all. Now, me? I don't give a damn. I call him as I see him. A nasty, rancid puke. He is hateful. He hates Ketchel, and Stanley Ketchel, and from the beginning of his thread, that's what it's all been about.:verysad It's sad, but that's why.
I asked you to give me a bombshell i don't have about Ketchel. I don't care about that Pete the Goat letter I have that too. Give me some holy grail information that nobody has on Stan.
You just asked for the pete the goat letter and now you move the goal post again. Whatever, youve been exposed. What a joke.
You have it or you don't. I didn't request the fight reports. Thats what you wanted. I want something eles.
I dont consider basic facts bombshells. Its not a bombshell to disclose that McVea couldnt make MW. Its not a bombshell to say that Ketchel had a rough way to go against Klaus. Its not a bombshell to post information on ketchels formative years. Its not a bombshell to write both sides of the argument in cases such as Papke Ketchel 1 and 4 etc etc. Im not asking for bombshells, Im asking for basic facts that even you couldnt get right, and even you admit you ****ed up on, and yet somehow Im lying and not being accurate, and somehow its up to me to do this legwork for you AFTER Ive asked for you to respond to these criticisms and then when you cant you try to deflect the conversation to family (which you didnt cover either). So why cant you just admit you rushed a poorly researched rag of a book and give me my money back????
You have these three accidents covered in the book? http://senya13.blogspot.com/2010/07/stanley-ketchel.html
Pompy.. I have to ask.. Why is your avatar featuring a picture of Jim Carey holding up a plate of scrambled bull****? Since you're suddenly ESB's fabled boxing *cough* SCHOLAR.. would you like to repeat your A Grade remarks regarding Les Darcy's willingness to tackle Jeff Smith for FREE?? Perhaps your own opposition to such facts can become an indication to your own wealth of studious historical detail. You've over opinionated yourself, especially in regards to my own lack of knowledge of the subject. I'm definately NOT a boxing historian, yet I quite easily made a self-proffessed know-it-all, in you, look the dopey ponce that you are. Can you please be sure to detail the actual facts about the demise of 'arry Greb, during his encounter with George Chip, prior to Les Darcy treating Chip like a cheap ***** in Australia?? I know.. foreign, strange and far away land.. blah blah blah... Sadly, KO Brown copped the same.. as did Buck Crouse.. McGoorty.. all the while, poor 'arry was still teething. How blind is a BLIND MAN??? How successful/knowlegdable were opthamologists during that period?? Was 'arry in fact blind?? Perhaps you can clarify the extend of the 'blindness', as a detached retina is quite commonly accepted as temporary/legal blindness by modern standards. Who, if anyone other than Dr. Frankenstein, would have performed any kind of surgery on a man with PERMANENT blindess in either eye during 'arry's time??