Haye vs. Klitschko - who will win the Event?

Winning the event is the gayest thing I've ever heard. It's not an event. It's a fight. Haye will lose by vicious KO inside of 4 rounds. But, some Brit *** will say he won the event because of a soft jab in the 1st.

 

Get back !

This is waaaaay over your head.

 

DO NOT LISTEN TO CUCHULAIN, HE IS NOT A CERTIFIED MEMBER OF THE MEM. A FIGHTER CAN WIN BOTH THE FIGHT AND THE EVENT

However his post above mine is correct

Signed,

The Don

 

Absolut right.

Wlad will knock Haye out. :bbb:bbb

Wlad is The Man at Heavyweight :happy:happy:happy

 

What did you think of this wknds boxing Jisi? What did you make or the Berto/Ortiz fight? Did you think Juanma was stopped too early?

 

I remember it clearly. Slugger's mistake was taking one universal example and concept (An underdog demolishing a fighter) and framing a linguistic and mathematical argument to prove fighters can't win both the fight and EVT. The idea that you can take one example to exemplify an equation and criteria for eventing is blatantly false. It ignores all the undergoing factors and elements to an actual fight and event. We have certain people trying to control things they can't control. It was part of their agenda to also try and seek clear-cut EVTs through predictions. Another absolute fallacy, because it can't be done. Eventology is far more a matter of philosophy than mathematics, which some refuse to grasp.

An assertation of the career of Arturo Gatti, which the Main Event Mafia will soon release will prove that a fighter can win both the fight and EVT.

 

Cheats on his wife and getting a divorce. Either you dont really know anything about Haye and are just on the bandwagon, or your ideas of "great family man" are ****ed up

 

Each fight presents an event winning opportunity. For example, we recently had Ishida EVT1 Kirkland and Morales EVT12 Maidana on the same card.

I also hypothesise that many subplots may offer further event winning possibilities. Take this wknd for example - I put forward for consideration by the MEM that this wknd not only did Hearn EVT Khan, McCloskey but also Sky EVT Primetime. This may appear to be a radical new way of thinking, but I feel it's root are very much set in logical thinking.

 

I love how you're thinking in the abstract. Perhaps what's being most overlooked is that there can be an event inside an event? What a radical concept that really messes with the mind.

An under-card fighter can win an EVT, just like main "event"/ feature fighter can win an EVT. If the under-card fighter wins the much better, more meaningful EVT he will have won the EVT within the EVT.

 

This winning the event business is bollocks. To win an event and lose the fight is like a Rocky scenario, an absolute nobody with no hope what so ever against a top quality fighter and nearly doing it.

The only way Haye or Vlad is winnin this event is by winnnin the fight.

 

Gabe Brown vs Sam Peter on the under card of Pavlik/Espino

 

You appear unfamiliar with the Main Event Mafia Manifesto (MEMM).

Please take the time to read one of our pamphlets and do not hesitate to ask if you have any further questions.

 

The purpose of this Sacred Post is to dispel the evil and pernicious doctrinal errors preached by the insurgent group known as MEM.

The heretical MEM is merely a misguided, breakaway, revisionist splinter group of the True Event Faith, as honourably and honestly exemplified by EVENT ( Eternal and Veracious Event Nonpareil Trust ).

Scholars of Pugilism are divided as to the source of this catechismal heresy. Some feel it began with the antipathy surrounding Saint Larry (peace and prosperity be upon him !), who was the first to speak the phrase in public. Thus, they disputed Vitali's EVT victory, arguing that LL was indeed a DW. The rot spread, and today results in the blasphemy of MEM and its ilk.

Others believe that the same evil spirit (whose name cannot be typed here ) who inhabits the tormented carcass of the once noble Don King, is behind this travesty. He has taken possession of young minds, enfeebled by atheism, porn gifs, peeing in girls butts, etc. and now manipulates them in their foul and unholy heathenism.

Whatever the source, the important truth here is that they are just plain wrong. As Cuchulain has proven in his exhaustive treatment of this tenet in his definitive paper in that notable and scholarly Cambridge publication, the Conjecture has become a Theorem.

A Fight winner can NOT be an Event winner in the same fight.




No matter how loudly the heathens shout !

This content is protected