The obvious answer is Morales.... but on the general forum I will be shocked if Pacquiao is not the runnaway winner.... same old :roll:
Maidana is an average inconsistent bumbling fighter. Pac would ko Maidana in 3 rounds. Morales at this stage on 1st round or 2.
Pacquiao JMM/Barrera Morales Morales has to be last as he is the only one of the four to ever quit a fight because he couldn't win it. It's difficult to separate the other three because none of them have ever quit or mentally caved, all three have came through adversity in their careers to become great successes. But one could argue that Pacquiao has them all trumped because he has shown the mental and physical strength to go in there and beat down much bigger men, whereas the other haven't ever shown that level of fortitude.
That's the obviously wrong answer. Morales is the only one out of all of them who has ever quit because he was going to lose. When Morales shows the balls to go in there with 160+lbs guys, let me know.
You didn't get the picture I was pointing out. Fighting is one aspect, but there are factors outside of the ring that can portray machismo or any sort of related charisma. Letting Arum call the shots 100% is a submissive behavior, it's like not having the balls to stand up to your boss. FYI Pac is one of my favorite fighters so don't go there.
If that is your criteria then I would put JMM last. Drinks own **** - stupidity isn't charismatic Avoided immediate Pac rematch Avoided Khan saying GBP is using him as Khan's stepping stone. Has a gay lover.
does getting rich beyond imagination makes your nuts smaller? donaire may have bigger nuts but with a shallow pocket.