Do people writing off Shane Mosley's chances vs Pac not realize that by doing so...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kittikasem, Apr 21, 2011.


  1. Emeritus

    Emeritus Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,109
    1
    Jan 22, 2010
    Any fool calling Shane toothless don't know sh!t about boxing!
     
  2. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Bull**** you would. ****ing ******* logic at it's best.

    Cotto barely scrapped through mosley, while margo destroyed cotto, i mean destroyed him, then mosley knocked margarito out.

    So don't feed me that bull**** that you would rate pac victory against cotto better, get the **** out of here.:rofl

    I didn't even have to mention the catchweight.
     
  3. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    What the hell has performance got to do with biggest win at a weight. So i guess if pac fought a close fight with Maidana at 140, would his biggest win at 140 be maidana or hatton? Because the hatton fight weren't close.

    Pacfart logic at it's best.
     
  4. Daddy

    Daddy Active Member Full Member

    1,101
    355
    Nov 16, 2004
    I think you are missing the fact that once Floyd started to open up in the 3rd round - Shane had no answer. It wasn't Floyds defence and smooth boxing that won the fight, it was Floyd's will to impose himself after being hurt that got to mosley. Pac will open up from the 1st round on, giving Shane only a punchers chance. No one is saying that Pac has better defense than Floyd, that would be ludicrous. Folks are comparing Floyd's higher then usual work rate to keep Shane pinned down to Manny's ususal hight workrate that will be the difference making Mosely's chances, very slim.
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    yes i do and so would most of the ESB posters.

    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=223559&page=9
     
  6. u29236

    u29236 Active Member Full Member

    1,117
    0
    May 29, 2010
    People are also forgetting the fact that everyone fought a PEDed Mosley, while Floyd fought a non-PEDed version of Mosley. Remember the drugs he used were from Balco. All those people who were caught were record breakers: Marion Jones, Barry Bonds, Jason Giambi, Roger Clemens, Shane Mosley, and many others. This is a testament to the quality of PEDs BALCO made. So you would have to rate all the fighters who beat and fought BALCO Mosley way higher then the non-BALCO Mosley version Floyd fought.
     
  7. Axman

    Axman Member Full Member

    114
    0
    Apr 16, 2011
    If Mosley was like 90 years old he might have a chance.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,654
    83,493
    Nov 30, 2006
    You're overstating how much Shane had Floyd hurt.

    It wasn't really that big a deal.
     
  9. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    err the poll shows floyd victory over mosley or pac over cotto, the poll is which victory was more impressive? Do you know what impressive means:patsch

    Pac stopped cotto, obviously that would be more impressive than a wide UD

    But the fact remains that if pac fought mosley before floyd did and won, either by UD or Knockout. Pac biggest WW win would have been mosley, and all you pacfarts would have said the same thing.
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    you failed to recognize that those who voted, specified even more so than the manner of victory that cotto looks to have more in the tank than the mosley who floyd fought.

    FFS, mosley looks **** in his fight against floyd excluding round 2. cotto was at least competitive for 4 to 5 rounds.
     
  11. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    :deal
     
  12. Kittikasem

    Kittikasem Guest

    So you think Pac-Hatton and Pac-Oscar were also more impressive wins than Floyd-Shane. Good on you, and here was I thinking you were a biased ballbag. :good