Pacquiao would have destroyed Salvador Sanchez

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MetalLicker, Apr 21, 2011.


  1. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    Pacquiao can destroy any one from 105-160 in history of boxing. Pacquiao has the pinoy power in both hands and the defense of a slippery snake. Trust me when I say Pacquiao is the true goat.
     
  2. analyzinfightin

    analyzinfightin Member Full Member

    194
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    That was prior to Sanchez coming into his own at featherweight, prior to his prime.

    Based on this poor logic, Pacquiao would also destroy guys like Arguello and Armstrong because they clearly lost early in their careers prior to hitting their primes.

    Pacquiao/Sanchez would've been a barn burner, a tough fight for both fighters. That fight would've been close, but Sanchez would've had the edge because of his superior boxing skill and granite chin.
     
  3. Shogun Assassin

    Shogun Assassin Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,843
    3
    Oct 22, 2010
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,654
    83,493
    Nov 30, 2006
    I honestly can't tell if we're on the same page here. :lol:
     
  5. slugger3000

    slugger3000 You Mad Bro? Full Member

    32,620
    3
    Jul 19, 2010
    :lol::rofl
     
  6. analyzinfightin

    analyzinfightin Member Full Member

    194
    0
    Dec 14, 2010
    Pacquiao is not unbeatable like you're suggesting.

    Pacquiao was halted twice at flyweight.

    Pacquiao struggled immensely against Marquez at featherweight and at super featherweight.

    Pacquiao lost to Morales at super featherweight.

    Pacquiao has looked much better at 135-147 because of genius matchmaking. Over the last several years, Pacquiao has been facing old, slow, past-prime, less skilled fighters, albeit bigger fighters, at catchweights.

    Pacquiao's best victories at welterweight came against the past-prime versions of Cotto and Margarito, two fighters who would've been destroyed by most of the top 15 top WWs to ever lace em' up.

    Based on these points, how do you conclude Pacquiao beats everyone from 105-160? :huh

    As great as Pacquiao has been, I don't see him getting by fighters like Mayweather at 130, Duran at 135 or 147, Leonard, Hearns, Hagler, to name a few. He doesn't even have a clear victory over Marquez.
     
  7. Axman

    Axman Member Full Member

    114
    0
    Apr 16, 2011
    Some of these Johnny come lately fight fans will never understand the points you are making since they Pac is their hero (emotional non-logical view) and they see him as invincible.
     
  8. Axman

    Axman Member Full Member

    114
    0
    Apr 16, 2011
    Case and point!! (The above is an emotional non-logical view of Pac)
     
  9. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    A 21 year old Salvador Sanchez sent prime Danny "Little Red" Lopez into retirement. What else do you really need to know?
     
  10. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    If you have Pac #1 P4P all time than we are definitely on the same page :deal
     
  11. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,871
    2
    Aug 14, 2009
    I do, #1 Pac, #2 Donaire
     
  12. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    What are you laughing at Margarito lover
     
  13. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    :happy
    Finally some one who knows boxing.
     
  14. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    I stopped reading here "Pacquiao is not unbeatable". You have a good imagination. Do you write childrens books?
     
  15. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Beat me to it.:yep

    Pacs ability to destory his opponents is uncanny. In fantasy fights he would destory them out of existence. Literally.