Does anyone else think The Ring magazine has been bias?

The Ring put Ward at #2 after Ward beat Kessler so read on, as Bute has a better overall resume to Ward and has beaten a fighter rated at #3 at time of his victory

The Ring had Bute as the #1 SMW and Ward at #2 etc After Ward beat Kessler. Now for Ward to have gone to #2, he beat then #1 Kessler, when Ward wasnt in the top 5. After the win Ward rightfully went above Kessler but Kessler is Wards only big win and overall Bute has a better resume than Ward even though not better than Froch or Kessler, so Bute became #1. Now Kessler beat Froch and was #3.
Froch beat Abraham coming off a loss and the Ring put Froch above Kessler after Froch had just lost to Kessler. Then Ward beat Bika a fighter Bute had beaten years previously and the Ring put Ward above Bute and made him #1.

Now this is where it seems strange to me.
The Ring is an American based magazine which understandably focuses on American fighters. Now America at this time have NO Ring champions.
Well chances are that the Super 6 final will be between Froch and Ward. Well the Ring sometimes lets the #1 against the #3 be for the Ring title.
It looks like the Ring has a plan in that if Ward was #2 and beat Froch at #3 he couldnt be a Ring champion and if Froch won he couldnt be either, but if they make Ward the #1 for no real reason other than for a win over Bika who Bute had already beaten they could make the winner the Ring champ and fight for their title.
The Ring had no reason to put Ward above Bute or Froch above Kessler. Ratings are supposed to be based on results.

I agree Bute hasnt fought the top guys yet but look at resumes overall, and note Andrade was in the top 5, the first time Bute beat Andrade

Bute beat Bika - better than Ward,
Miranda - better than Ward,
Andrade twice,
Joppy,
Zuniga, better than Cloud and Cloud beating Zuniga has put him above Dawson
Brinkley
Berrio - Holds a win over Steiglitz
Magee who is a European champ and was world rated fighter
You could also note Mock, Tatvosyan and Salem

Ward has beaten
Kessler - A very good win better than any name on Bute resume but remember that Kessler was an unwell fighter
Miranda
Green - who lost to Miranda
Bika
Next Abraham on a winning run of 1 injury victory and then 2 losses the last being very decisive
You could also note Buchanan

Now Wards victory over Kessler isnt better overall than Andrade twice, Berrio, Zuniga etc

 

I was answering to you. I dont know if you have read everyone elses posts on here or not etc

 

Its an answer that has some understanding but I couldnt call it correct as The Ring advertises itself as the bible of boxing. The bible of boxing would indicate that it focuses on all fighters of all nationalities and countries.
Would you say it makes it correct based on that answer to elevate a fighter 4 months after his last fight when he wasnt as conclussive as another fighter rated similar to him, against a common opponent?

 

Maybe so, and he might go on to be an ATG, but that doesnt explain, the highlighted parts in red

This content is protected

etc After Ward beat Kessler. Now for Ward to have gone to #2, he beat then #1 Kessler, when Ward wasnt in the top 5. After the win Ward rightfully went above Kessler but Kessler is Wards only big win and overall Bute has a better resume than Ward even though not better than Froch or Kessler, so Bute became #1. Now Kessler beat Froch and was #3.
Froch beat Abraham coming off a loss and the Ring put Froch above Kessler after Froch had just lost to Kessler.

This content is protected

 

He doesnt have an overall better resume than Bute. Read below

:deal

 

Bias is terrible
Look at who Pascal has fought in his last 3 fights
Diaconu
Dawson
drew with Hopkins

In Hopkins last 3 fights he has fought
Ornelas
Jones coming off of a first round KO
drew with Pascal

Yet so many think Hopkins should be in the P4P and not Pascal (though I noted you said both should be).