Tyson versus Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Apr 21, 2011.


  1. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009
    I acknowledge your points and accept them, but he was also a fat disgusting mess
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    It's a blot on his record, smack bang in his prime.
    But I don't think it's a particularly terrible defeat.
    Dempsey was judged to have lost 3 rounds of a 4-rounder and he scored a knockdown over Meehan in the process.
     
  3. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    What you fail to acknowledge is that Lewis won all those fights and for the course of them. He wasnt knocked out or trailing on cards, thats the point, and that group is far larger and no worse than Bruno and Mcall.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    I don't fail to acknowledge. I agree he improved.
    Like I said to start with, we disagree on the degree to which he improved.
     
  5. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    I don't really think it's fair to dismiss blemishes because he wasn't at his peak. He was certainly close to his peak though: he'd fought since his teens, had over 50 professional bouts under his belt (with a sick KO ratio), was active, and at the same weight he'd always fight at. Sorry, but I don't think one undergoes a magical transformation from "mediocre, pre-prime" to "all time great champion" in one year and a few bouts.

    Arguing that way we can also say that Tyson himself never actually lost (in 1990 he was further from his peak than Dempsey was when he lost to Meehan), etc, etc.

    It's silly to play the old that-loss-doesn't-count-he-wasn't-prime game. You know it.
     
  6. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    57
    Dec 26, 2009
    An ex-flyweight who ate himself up to 185-195lbs of pure lard & never trained at all...

    Meehan would be decapitated in the first round.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,100
    45,364
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sometimes the eye test is enough...

    This content is protected


    vs.

    This content is protected
     
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,406
    9,354
    Jul 15, 2008
    Cool exhibit card of Meechan ... never saw it before ..
     
  9. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    152
    Mar 4, 2009
    If only "Fat" Willie would've stayed in fighting shape. Perhaps we wouldn't be cracking jokes about him but talking of how he was one of the overlooked contenders of his era. He was fast and clever, but had no conditioning. Can't expect a natural middleweight to beat heavyweights without putting an effort in the gym. Still hard to imagine that the man held decisions over the likes of Jack Dempsey, Sam Langford and Jack Dillon.

    This content is protected
     
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,406
    9,354
    Jul 15, 2008
    Good points and amazing photo!
     
  11. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    willie meehan was a bonafide thug who was too cool to train in an era of 25 rounders.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,100
    45,364
    Feb 11, 2005
    So, we all agree Meehan would take a 4 rounder against Tyson.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Meehan seems to be sort of an extreme version of the late James Toney - difference being that Toney was a natural supermiddleweight and actually has championship credentials.

    I'd pick Tyson to squash him like a bug over 4, 8 or any number of rounds. Meehan would be murdered.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    :lol:
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,790
    47,643
    Mar 21, 2007
    What is the relevance of his fame and status? He was still removed from his prime...and it's there for all to see. Your insistance that Dempsey was pre-prime as a fighter - so much so that losses can be dismissed totally - is basically speculation. On the other hand, Lewis improved vastly, visually.

    Seems like a double standard to me.

    Who'se comparing them? They don't need to be compared. We just need to apply your logic even-handidly. The ways you describe Depsey improving - "seasoning" - inspite of his vast proffessional experience is the exact way in which Lewis improved - in addition to a real tuck to his technical nuances.

    If Dempsey's loss is meaningless because he wasn't peak, so is McCall I should say. On the other hand, I don't agree with you that Meehan's victory should be dismissed so readily, so I would consider the McCall loss.