Not really I have criticize Floyd and far from being his fan. But I respect him just I like I respect Manny. But I have the rights to think why in the hell someone would throw away a potential 50 million dollar fight and so many inconsistent statements. This is coming from an unbias boxing fan, which are very few
No. Because they feature the most immature and emotional fanbase... I have never heard an unbiased and objective post from any of those guilty of outright shaft-recievery. They're always calling names and not substantiating anything with rational, intelligent, objective opinion.
Shane is going to put serious hands on Manny. If Manny thought that Margarito's one head and one body shot that landed the whole fight hurt, wait till Shane puts leather on him multiple times in every round.
I didn't need to put one... Objective posts get ignored or ridiculed by the likes of you and your ball-juggling buddies... I'm merely pointing out something that's very obvious, and you keep validating my accurate insults with each of your replies...
You didnt need to put one = You dont have one ****** A sweeping generalisations is not "pointing out something obvious" It just points out that your a ****** :good
+1 Why fixe a fight against a shot fighter when your in your prime and an ATG? There no ****ing need to fix this fight
But for the record, I doubt Shane was on gear for more than the DLH fight, and this is a real tough fight for Pac. Pac should win, although Shane has a shot and I wouldn't be shocked to see him stop Pac, I'll be picking a Pac win by decision. There is your rational , intelligent & objective opinion. It beats everything you've had to offer (and most other posters on this thread) to this point.
You can keep making false and unqualified insults to me... At least my statements about the posters on this thread, including you, are provable and accurate. :admin
For the record, for every fight of this magnitude the other guy always has a ""pucher chances" else it wouldnt be a fight but sparring. You think theres more IQ in your thinking that whats actualy in it!
I think pac will box for the first 4 rounds then as shane fades pac will open up more and land combinations... I see shane winning 1 or 2 rounds but in the end pac will win by a late stoppage.. Contrary to my thread I could also see a UD for pac.. Because shane is a tough SOB! I was just having a little fun..
My view is similar, but the way Pacs been training im leaning towards a stoppage. The subject that has been discussed many times, you cant expect all threads to be discussing the exact same thing... thats your first rational response in thread, coming in and spouting your "im a better boxing Fan" elitist bull**** just made you look like a ****** :good
Nope, all guess work on your end. I follow many boxers, so you assumptions and "holier than though" attitude smacks of ***gotry. That is atleast true, as you have already proven by your post :good