Manny Pac vs. Naz Hamed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Flash Jab, Apr 23, 2011.


  1. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
    I'm telling you that Hamed didn't fight at 135lbs. He's 5ft 2?:lol:

    I think it's better to keep these guys in the weight class they shared. If you think Pac could take FLUSH bombs from Hamed at featherweight and live to tell the tale - best of luck to you!

    Pacs punch resistance will have improved as he climbed the weights so your argument is flawed.
     
  2. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
  3. left right left

    left right left Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,748
    1
    Aug 14, 2010
    Pacquiao with way too much workrate for off balance Hamed.

    Pacquiao KO Hamed
     
  4. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    *******s, why bother:lol:

    GO back to Pac's crotch!
     
  5. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    edit: I ****ed up here.

    Don't even know why we're even discussing this fight with the weight difference.
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pac by knockout! No disrespect to Hamed. Hamed was really good fighter!
     
  7. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009

    You removed the "prime" DLH...........good edit:good
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    nah, just calling on some of the BS excuses that bitter mexicans like you would always say whenever a mexican boxer lose. :hi:
     
  9. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    I took out everything. Didn't realize that Hamed fought at 125, for some reason I thought he was at 135.

    Although, I do think that a prime De La Hoya punched harder than Hamed.
     
  10. El Terrible

    El Terrible Active Member Full Member

    715
    0
    Apr 26, 2010
    I agree with this.
    Definitely a tough one to call at the weight, but id favour Paquaio 7 times out of 10.
     
  11. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    SO you were talking about something you knew very little of:think
     
  12. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    No, not at all. I used to be a fan of Hamed and saw most of his fights, just didn't realize that he fought at a lower class than I originally though.

    Not a huge mistake here.
     
  13. TG1

    TG1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,965
    11
    Mar 4, 2010
    It's not a small one either mate but props for acknowledging it!
     
  14. Napoleon

    Napoleon Smokin' Full Member

    2,411
    44
    Sep 4, 2006
    :lol: Normally I wouldn't think its a big deal, but I did base my whole argument on thinking that Hamed was bigger, so yeah I did **** up.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    hamed would have a good chance at 122 where pac is much less polished and will fight you head-on than lets say the pac that fought MAB and JMM at 126. stylewise hamed could be more difficult for pac than MAB, but i would take pac's straighter punches than hamed, not to mention the difference in class.