Roach "The risk and reward right now is not worth it"

You really don't understand the difference between lineality and quality?

So YOU believe that Baldomir was a better fighter than Mayweather before they fought???

This content is protected

 

Winning the lineality proves your quality dip****.atsch

If it didn't why would so much emphasis get placed on doing it.

You can't have it both ways. :hi:

Pac wins a lineal title, oh **** it the greatest thing since moses 10 commandments.

Baldomir wins a lineal title : Mehhh anyone can win one.:rofl

 

That didn't answer my question at all. So back then you believed that Baldomir was a superior fighter to Mayweather, on the basis that Baldomir held the lineal title therefore he was automatically, magically the best fighter in the division?? :huh

 

I believe baldomir was the number WW at the time, also look at where ricky hatton is at 147 :rofl

2 guys floyd fought when they was on a ****ing roll, yet he called a cherry picker, yet pac gets away with his bull****.

This content is protected

 

Hold on, now.

 

typo

I got excited.

 

and you know more about boxing, the one in between the legs is the one missing, ehy

 

Did you? What a gimp. Simmer down, it's a boxing forum.

 

That isn't what I asked you at all. Answer the question that I have asked you numerous times.

 

Bottom line is, Floyd is the one holding up a fight with Paq in favor of beating up women and security guards.
I guess some people admire that.

 

i wish he beat you up.

 

That isn't what I asked you at all. Answer the question that I have asked you numerous times.

 

Bladegunner what a **** lol

This content is protected

 

but i thought pac was a warrior...who fights for honor?

 

*********
There are several fighters that all wanted, still wants to and will do any and everything asked of them just to get a fight with Pacquiao. They won't haggle over money/purse, they'll go up in weight (Marquez), they'll come down in weight, they won't even ask for a drug-test. But the recent fighters on his resume didn't ask nor even pursued a fight with Pacquiao. Not Hatton, Cotto, Clottey or Margarito. They were all PICKED by Roach....Can anyone explain why he picked these fighters, when others WANTED A FIGHT WITH PACQUIAO?

I remember when this Motha'Fuka named "RA the Rugged" (who frankly, I nor anyone else have ever heard of)....he went on this rant that was posted on Y-tube asking Floyd questions like "Why did you fight Corley and Brusseles?" And then every muthafuka with a computer immediately ran into every boxing forum they could find and started "CO-SIGNING". "Yeah what he said", "So why fight Corley and Brusseles?" Both "RA the Rugged" and the fans that fed into his knowledge-less propaganda knew very little about Boxing and it's hierarchy. The fights with Corley and Brusseles were wait 4 it, wait 4 it....TWO TITLE ELIMINATORS which put him in position for Arturo Gatti's title (a title which Gatti got from beating Jesse James Leija).

What Pacquiao has done is make fans forget about how Boxing used to work. He starting moving up weight and not even fighting eliminators but simply choosing to fight the WEAKEST Belt-Holders (David Diaz 135lbs, Cotto 147lbs...oops, may bad 145lbs) or fighting fighters coming off losses (Clottey), suspensions with NO LICENSE for Vacant Titles...at a Catchweight (Margarito). When did this not only become acceptable, but when did it become the criteria for an ATG?

This is not a criticism of Manny Pacquiao....But this has always been my STANCE ON ROACH AND ARUM. And for the life of me....I just can't understand why PACQUIAO'S FANS can't see this as well.:-(