naz beats pac.... at common weights pac isnt the fighter he is know people who say otherwise havnt watched boxing since the 90s and only have recently followed pacs hype The pac that lost to morales would lose to Naz
based on what? pacquiao is faster, has higher workrate and has straighter punches than hamed. pac also is the proven greater fighter. you think hamed would just beat pac just like his other opponents? the time he faced an ATG opponent in barrera, he failed. and pac lost to morales because morales boxed pac and used his long jab at 130. hamed had not even fought at 130 nor the boxing skills that morales has.
its not important who beat who. Fact is from bantamweight to featherweight Nas bullies and beats up pac, all followed by a devastating knockout :deal not to mention pac was knocked out twice and drew at the weights nas dominated
or you mean your fantasy? what's next, hamed bullies and beats barrera, marquez and morales from bantamweight up to welterweight? :rofl can you prove this facts of yours?
Based on nothing. This Thread reminds me of These British Calzaghe Apologizers. Hamed's career is full of carefully selected no-hopers/bums and finally his first World Class opponent and guy gets flat out Schooled his ass. They have nerves to bring up Pac early Losses.atsch Pac was Young Growing Fighter and has improved Great deal since his losses and beaten Greater Fighters that he lost to. Pac Annihilated this clown before 6. Hamed b- boxer
Hamed never fought anyone as remotely good or comparable to Manny Pac(except MAB whom Manny beat of course).NO-****ING-BODY.Vastly overrated Hamed gets his ass beat by Manny Pac.Then his fans come up with several excuses why he lost.:yep
The Naseem Hamed from 95 (Steve Robinson) to 97 (up to but not including Kelly) was a huge challange for anyone. Looking back it's a great shame he didnt defend against his mandatory Juan Manuel Marquez. Pacquiao's punch resistance improved as he went up the weights but if Marquez can have Pacquiao bouncing off the floor, a prime Naz certainly could at featherweight. Saying that, Naz could get caught & could well be knocked down so I see an up & down fight with either Naz by KO or Pacquiao on points.
This would be a fight were ANYTHING could happen. The Naz that dominated Steve Robinson has a real shot vs any FW version of Pacquiao. Pac beating Barrera & Barrera beating Naz does not mean **** because we would be using the best versions of each fighter at the weight. I think the MAB that beat Naz stands at least a 50/50 chance vs any FW Pacquiao.... as for the Naz-Pac fight ?... stylewise, I really cant call it tbh.
Right !.... enoughs enough, your embarassing yourself now, he`s nowhere near it.... Willie Pep was the best FW who ever lived & would have schooled Naz so bad that it would make Barrera-Hamed look like a robbery.
pacquiao dominated the p4p#3 MAB version. pac has the stylistic and speed advantage over barrera, how can you honestly think that the barrera who boxed hamed would outbox pacquiao? even if barrera reverts to the slugger that he is in the morales fight, he would just play much more into pac's style. please enough with the excuses that it was not the best barrera that pac beat nor it was the best hamed that barrera beat. you guys are full of ****.