Al Bernstein, why Pacquiao will beat Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hofbrau, Apr 21, 2011.


  1. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    His 'adaptivity' is overrstated. He fought every southpaw the same way. He's fought 90% of his fights the same way. He's also faster and more athletic then 99% of everybody he's fought.
     
  2. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    Sometimes when we touch ... - emmanuael half bakla pacquiao
    Easy to understand. PEDs. Pac will be shamed just like Manny Ramirez, Barry Bonds, Marion Jones, Shane Mosley, Roy Jones Jr ....
     
  3. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    What a ****ing dumb post. How many accounts do you have you ****ing **** sucker?
     
  4. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    You people are in for a real shock when Mayweather outboxes this guy, seriously... a big shock.
     
  5. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Pass that **** :rasta
     
  6. ViktorVaughn

    ViktorVaughn Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,924
    0
    Jul 18, 2008

    +1. Seems like a good analysis to me. Floyd IMO could hurt anyone, more with his accuracy than power actually but he prefers playing it safe by not engaging that much. Floyd and Manny are really like the Ying and the Yang.
     
  7. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    I respect Berstein's opinions tremendously. He knows his ****. And i agree. Let's not forget he gave the "what if" scenario of "IF" PBF's counter shots hurt Pac, he picks PBF. But if Pac can stand those shots, then he picks Pac via wide UD. And that makes perfect sense. Floyd is great at making the first or second shot miss but he's never faced an offensive machine like Pac. Having said that, i still favor Floyd if they ever fought given the styles.
     
  8. kingmiller8282

    kingmiller8282 Active Member Full Member

    1,105
    12
    Nov 15, 2009
    Dude you're an Idiot, Like Seriously.......
     
  9. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    I respect Al Bernstein probably more than any other boxing announcer. Let's not forget he also works for Showtime. Al is not Larry Merchant who is unafraid to bash fights on his own network.

    What it really comes down to is Floyd has been inactive. Floyd is not leaving the same kind of impression Pac is leaving by staying active. Experts like Al will naturally lean towards the more active guy when comparing two elite atheletes.
     
  10. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    Floyd has no power @ 147. Almost every fighter he faced who are true Welterweights
    gave him major problems and none are near the level of Manny. Floyd is only older now and about to drop from the P4P list in May. Once Manny victimizes Shane, Floyd fans will seem very delusional.

    Mayweather fans have had the wrong read on Pac for years and for some reason believe Floyd is still in his prime.
     
  11. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    great post.....:good
     
  12. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,804
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    This statement as a whole is just completely false and implies that either you haven't seen 90% of his fights, or you have a peculiar definition of adaptation. Every fighter has a style. No fighter will stray completely from their inherent style in a fight. Being adaptive in the ring does not imply that today a guy is a counter puncher and tomorrow he's a brawler (although Floyd has fought in MANY different manners within the same framework throughout his career). There are nuances that individuals who understand boxing can readily see, such as rhythm, foot placement, taking angles away from your opponent, etc. I really don't think its a matter of his adaptivity being overstated as it is that people don't understand adaptivity when they see it.

    The fact that he was faster than a lot of guys he's fought has no bearing on his ability to adapt. Speed doesn't win fights. If it did, guys like Shane, Berto, Judah, Alexander would still be undefeated. Its not about speed as much as its about timing. Pacquiao will learn this when they fight. Pacquiao has been faster than 100% of the fighters he's fought till this point, and his record is blemished.
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    123,179
    35,354
    Jun 23, 2005
    :lol::rofl:lol:
    ****ing hilarious coming from a Pac fan.
     
  14. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    123,179
    35,354
    Jun 23, 2005
    Bernstein's analysis while I respect it, is typical of someone who over-values offense and under-values defense, and ring generalship. It's also typical like someone else mentioned earlier of someone who's never been in the ring themselves. If he thinks Pac will throw anywhere close to 1000 punches against PBF than I don't know what to say about him. Bernstein works for showtime and it's in his best interest to build up Pac especially since they have him now. Also if you poll boxers you'll see more will pick PBF to win than Pac why? Because they understand things like defense and ring generalship and they appreciate it and respect it more it more than guys that haven't been in the ring before. PBF does the subtle things better than Pac and it will show up and be the difference when they fight.
     
  15. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    :good