Heavyweight Lineal Champions + Notable Contenders

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 28, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    First off I'd like to thank MattDonnellson, Kmac, SonnyListon'sJab, Jack, Casamyor, Bremen, Cobbler, TBooze and others for helping me with this.

    What I have done is gone through the resume's of every lineal heavyweight champ (From Sullivan to Lewis) and looked for 5 pieces of data: how long they reigned, how many top 10 ranked (pre 1892 it was newspaper clippings, extracts, etc. from 1892 to 1923 it was Matt's rankings, from then on it was the ring rankings) opponents they beat, how many top 10 ranked opponents they defended the lineal belt against, whether they beat "the man" and lastly whether they had beaten a past or future lineal champ.

    Here is the raw data:

    I have it all tabulated in a spreadsheet so all I have to do is think up a point system and bob's yer uncle

    Key: CC=current champ, TD = title defence, NC=non-current champ.

    Sullivan: 7 years: Donaldson, Dalton, Ryan (x2), Elliot, Mitchell, Slade, Mcaffrey, Kilrain (TD).

    Corbett: 5 years: Choynski (x2), Kilrain, Mcaffrey, Mccoy, Sullivan (CC)

    Fitzsimmons: 2 years: Hall, Choynski, Maher, Corbett (CC), Ruhlin, Sharkey, O’Brien

    Jeffries: 6 years: Sharkey (x2, 1TD), Armstrong, Fitzsimmons (x2, CC + TD), Corbett (x2, 2TDNC), Kennedy, Ruhlin (TD)

    Hart: 1 year: Carter( x2), Ferguson, Ruhlin, Johnson (NC), Root, Sullivan, Ross

    Burns: 3 years: Hart (CC), O’Brien

    Johnson: 7 years: Childs, Gardner, Martin, Mcvea (x3), Ferguson, Jeanette (x4), Langford, Fitsimmons (NC*), Flynn, Burns (CC), Ross (TD), Kaufman (TD), Ketchel (TD), Jeffries (TDNC*), Moran (TD),

    Willard: 4 years: J. Johnson (CC), Moran (TD), F. Johnson

    Dempsey: 7 years: Morris, Fulton, Miske (x2, 1TD), Willard (CC), Brennan (TD), Carpentier (TD), Gibbons (TD), Firpo (TD), Sharkey (NC)

    Tunney: 2 years: Spalla, Risko, Dempsey (x2, CC, TDNC), Heeney (TD)

    Schmeling: 2 years: Risko, Uzcudun, Sharkey (CC), Stribling (TD), Walker, Neusel, Louis (NC)

    Sharkey: 1 years: F. Johnson, Rojas, Weinert, Renault, Gorman, Godfrey, Wills, Maloney, Delaney, Stribling, Carnera (NC), Schmelling (CC)

    Carnera: 1 year: Stribling, Godfrey, Levinsky, Schaaf, Sharkey (CC)

    Baer: 1 year: Risko, Levinsky (x2), Schaaf, Griffiths, Schmelling (NC), Carnera (CC), Farr, Galento

    Braddock: 2 years: Lasky, Baer (CC), Farr

    Louis: 12 years: Massera, Ramage (x2), Perroni, Brown, Carnera (NC), Levinsky, Baer (NC), Retzlaff, Attore, Braddock (CC), Farr (TD), Mann (TD), Schmelling (TDNC), Galento (TD), Pastor (TD), Godoy (TD), Paycheck (TD), Burman (TD), Simon (x2, 2TD), Baer (x2, 2TD), Conn (x2, 2TD), Nova (TD), Mauriello (TD), Walcott (x2, 2TDNC), Savold, Brion

    Charles: 2 years: Maxim (x4, 1TD), Bivins (x2), Baksi, Maxim, Walcott (x2, NC +TDNC), Valentino (TD), Louis (TDNC), Oma (TD), Layne (x2), Brion, Harrison, Wallace, Satterfield

    Walcott: 1 year: Sheppard, Murray, Baksi, Bivins, Gomez, Oma, Maxim (x2), Ray, Johnson, Agramonte, Charles (x2, CC + TDNC)

    Marciano: 4 years: Lastarza (x2, 1TD), Layne, Louis (NC), Matthews, Walcott (x2, CC + TDNC), Charles (x2, TDNC), Cockell (TD), Moore (TD)

    Patterson: 5 years: Harrison, Slade, Jackson (x2, 1TD), Moore, Harris (TD), London (TD), Johanneson (x2, CC +TDNC), Machen, Chuvalo, Bonavena

    Johanneson : 1 year: Machen, Patterson (CC)

    Liston: 2 years: Bethea, DeJohn, Williams, Harris, Folley, Machen, Patterson (x2, CC + TDNC), Clark

    Ali: 11 years: Daniels, Lazarante, Moore, Jones, Cooper, Liston (x2, CC+TDNC), Patterson (x2, TDNC, NC), Chuvalo (TD), London (TD), Mildenberger (TD), Terrell (TD), Folley (TD), Quarry (x2), Bonavena, Ellis, Foster, Bugner (x2, TD), Norton (x2, TD), Frazier (x2, NC + TDNC), Foreman (CC), Wepner (TD), Lyle (TD), Young (TD), Evangelista (TD), Shavers (TD), L. Spinks (CC)

    Frazier: 3 years: Bonavena (x2), Chuvalo, Ramos, Quarry (x2), Ellis, Foster (TD), Ali (TDNC), Bugner

    Foreman: 4 years: Chuvalo, Frazier (x2 CC +NC), Norton (TD), Lyle, Moorer (CC),

    L. Spinks: 0 years: Ali (CC), Evangelista, Mercardo

    Holmes: 5 years: Shavers (x2), Norton, Evangelista, Weaver, Zanon, Jones, LeDoux, Ali (CC), Berbick (TD), Spinks (TDNC), Cooney (TD), Cobb (TD) Witherspoon (TD), Smith (TD), Bey (TD), Williams (TD), Mercer

    M. Spinks: 3 years: Holmes (x2, CC + TDNC)

    Tyson : 2 years: Berbick, Smith, Thomas, Tucker, Biggs, Holmes (NC*), Spinks (CC) , Williams (TD), Ruddock (x2), Bruno, Seldon,

    Douglas: 0 years: Page, Berbick, Tyson (CC)

    Holyfield: 3 years: Thomas, Dokes, Rodrigues, Douglas (CC), Foreman (TDNC), Holmes (TDNC), Bowe (CC), Tyson (x2 NC), Moorer (NC), Rahman

    Bowe: 1 year: Holyfield (x2 CC + NC), Hide, Golota (x2)

    Moorer: 0 years: Holyfield (CC)

    Briggs: 1 year: Foreman (CC), Lyakhovic

    Lewis: 6 years: Ruddock, Tucker, Jackson, Butler, Mercer, Mccall, Akinwade, Golota, Briggs (CC), Holyfield (TDNC), Grant (TD), Tua (TD), Rahman (CC), Tyson (TDNC), V. Klitschko (TD)

    Rahman: 0 years: Lewis (CC), Barrett

    notable contenders - using the criteria they never beat the number 1/2 whilst ranked 1/2, nor did they beat "the man"

    V. Klitschko: Kirk Johnson, Sanders, Williams (TD), Peter, Gomez, Arreola, Kevin Johnson, Solis, Briggs (NC*)

    W. Klitschko: Byrd (x2), McCline, Peter, Brock, Brewster, Ibragimov, Thompson, Rahman (NC*), Chagaev, Chambers (TD)
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    It gives some interesting results. If I give each fighter: 1 point for every year they reigned and every past or future lineal champ they beat; 2 points for beating the current lineal champ; 3 points for every top 10 opponent they faced and 4 points for every time they defended vs a top 10 opponent, here is the ranking.

    Louis
    Ali
    Holmes
    Johnson
    Charles
    Lewis
    Marciano
    Patterson
    Walcott
    Holyfield
    Jeffries
    Dempsey
    Sullivan
    Sharkey
    Frazier
    Tyson
    W. Klitschko
    Liston
    V. Klitschko
    Baer
    Corbett
    Schmelling
    Hart
    Fitzsimmons
    Foreman
    Tunney
    Willard
    Carnera
    Bowe
    Burns
    Braddock
    M. Spinks
    L. Spinks
    Douglas
    Johanneson
    Briggs
    Rahman
    Moorer
     
  3. justcause

    justcause Sword of Justice Full Member

    394
    0
    Jul 18, 2010
    That's alot to digest. But a very good job none the less. Interesting point system. Funny how the top two spots are exactly the two you would assume without a system.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    It is, I just wanted to get the information altogether in one place, when you look at what hart and sharkey did in their time, they get really underrated, same with patterson.

    I feel also the k bros compare well with champs from past era's in terms of accomplishments.

    One thing is, liston is very hard to rank highly using any consistent system. A lot have him in the top 4/8, based on what he actually did in the ring, it's hard to justify.
     
  5. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    How did you conclude vitaly and wlad to be lineal?

    The ring belt? Thats not a lineal thing at all. And the vitaly v Johnson fight wasn't even a title fight For the WBC. Not sure how it's slipped in there.

    As far as I know there is no lineal champ Post Lewis.

    Wlad the most likely after he beats haye and his brother retires. But when the best two guys won't fight and share belts, IMO therea no way you can proclaim one lineal unless he has both belts.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    neither Vitali nor Wladimir were ever lineal champ
     
  7. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    Ah. Sorry man should have put more time into the cc etc.

    Impressive work, wSnt trying to be too negative. Just IMO neither brother has been lineal for whatever reason.
     
  8. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    So after losing to Lewis, Vitali became lineal? And after Vitali retired, Wlad becomes lineal by beating Byrd?........:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    No to both.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    I used the ring ratings from 1924 onwards but not always their choice of belt. I don't believe they awarded it to big george the second time nor to briggs. Other cases also.

    After vitali beat johnson and sander beat wlad they were seen as the best two heavyweights. The winner became the new champion.

    With wlad it is not as clear cut, but beating chagaev who was prime and ranked number 3 was enough.

    Is either claim box less legitimate than say sharkey vs schmelling or patterson vs moore?

    Lineal rules just state number 1 has to beat 2 or 3. In both cases of the brothers this happened by my reckoning, unless anyone has evidence to the contrary?
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    But you're happy that hart was a lineal champ? Or schmelling? Or patterson? Or holmes?
     
  12. Piffer

    Piffer ****** KIT KAT Full Member

    1,603
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  13. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    There is no Lineal Champ Lewis retired lineal, and today we have 3 men who hold portions of the HW title.
     
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,426
    13,279
    Jan 6, 2007
    By that piece of amazing logic, there have been no lineal champions since Marciano, who retired with the title, undefeated.
     
  15. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    I thought that was the point of this thread, but it was supposed to include talent as a factor too? :conf