Where does oscar de la hoya rank?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 26, 2011.

  1. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14

    How do you justify having Dempsey ahead of Frazier, Holyfield and Tyson.
     
  2. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    Dominance.
     
  3. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14
    Excuse me, he had less title fights, and was totally outclassed by former lightheavy the great Gene Tunney.
     
  4. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    Actually let me correct that, I don't think Dempsey was really any more dominant than the likes of Tyson. He might of had a slightly longer peak, but he wasn't more dominant.

    Again, he's at the tail end of my hundred and if you wanted to exchange him for another similar-level heavyweight like a Tyson, I wouldn't consider it a sin.
     
  5. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    True, I'd take that over an outclassing by Buster Douglas though :good
     
  6. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    That's a good question. It's not non-pareil, but it arguably should be.
     
  7. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14

    would'nt say Dempsey is on a similar level as Tyson, for one he did'nt know how to cut the ring off, his technic was'nt as good and his defense was lesser than Tyson.

    Dempsey was great but he is one of the most unjustifiably overrated fighters.
     
  8. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    I'm waiting for someone to ask a question like where Jimmy Bivins, Freddie Miller, Pascual Perez, Tiger Flowers, Stanley Ketchel, Battling Nelson, Felix Trinidad, Carlos Zarate, Cocoa Kid, Midget Wolgast or Owen Moran are at.

    Disappointing that people are (predictably) crying over heavyweights.
     
  9. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14
    Why not just answer the question your asked first, I don't care if its a predictable question, I asked it because I'm interested in knowing why.
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    More or less the answer is that a lot of guys are roughly on the same level. Guys like Holyfield, Frazier,Tyson etc. don't have much separating them from the likes of Lewis and Dempsey.

    Just so you know, here's how I grade them all on resume (out of 50), dominance (out of 40), longevity (out of 10 ) and character (out of 10 ):


    Lewis: 33.25 + 30 + 7 +7.75 = 78

    Dempsey: 32.75 + 29 + 7.5 + 8.25 = 77.5

    Frazier: 33.75 + 28 + 6.5 + 8.5 = 76.75

    Tyson: 33 + 29 + 7 + 7.5 = 76.5

    Holyfield: 34.25 + 25.25 + 7.5 + 8.75 = 76.25

    Hardly a world of difference there....
     
  11. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14

    Dempsey's resume is clearly lesser than Frazier, Holyfield and Tyson.
     
  12. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    What make's Tyson's for example THAT much better?
     
  13. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14
    More title fight in shorter space of time, won title quicker, better competion and better skill set and fighter, would be the main reason's.
     
  14. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    98
    I was speaking about the "better competition", not the other stuff. Break it down.
     
  15. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,496
    Likes Received:
    14
    Spinks was better than Carpentier, and more proven at Heavy and the peformance was more emphatic

    Berbick, Smith, Thomas, Tucker, Biggs, Holmes, Tubbs, Bruno, Williams,

    is a more better title reign than

    Willard, Miske, Brennen, Darcy, Gibbons, Firpo.