'European heavy weights can s**k my d**k' Chris Arreola

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJIG1FoVfbk[/ame]


Why i lost respect for Arreola after his first beating.

 

How do you come to that conclussion :huh.
Haye won the WBC WBA Ring CW titles from the top man at CW.
Adamek won a vacant title against Briggs .
Haye wins a unification fight with world rated Enzo Mac.
Adamek loses to Dawson atsch.
Haye wins away again and beats WBA HW champ Valuev
Adamek beats Cunningham (a good win), but Cunningham only had that high status because the top man Haye moved up to HW. That is Adameks biggest win, over Cunningham, and Cunningham was only rated so highly because the more accomplished Haye left the division.

I think you need to live with that fact that Adamek isnt what you wish he was

 

The discussion ends with that GEM:thumbsup

Haye's resume has no depth at all.

 

deluded brit:smoke

 

I wrote ages ago that Adamek is hype at HW and will lose when he faces the top European class.
The McBride fight was just a tuneup and nothing more atsch

 

But still better than Adameks :smoke

 

Enzo had his ****ing title handed to him and is a ****ing no chinned scrub.

Valuev lost his ****ing title in the ring and had it handed back to him.

Mormeck is/was shot as ****..

David's resume is ****ing WEAK.

 

Why dont you tell me whats deluded then, rather than just make the statement .
Haye has won WBC WBA WBO RING CW titles and WBA HW title
Adamek has won WBC LHW title and IBF CW title off a fighter rated below Haye, which was his biggest win.
You tell me whats deluded :huh

 

atsch When keeping it real goes wrong! We understand that Kris is very out of shape but damn, leave the gay jokes alone!:-(

 

You are deluded. You are trying to discredit Adamek and give too much credit to Haye. For instance you wrote that Haye won Ring title, but you didnt write that Adamek won that too. It probably doesnt suite to your theory. You say Adamek lost to Dawson (p4p rated fighter now) but forget to mention who Haye lost to.

Whats more Adamek fought better opposition in his career. Dawson and Cunningham are much better than any fighter Haye faced. Whats more they were actaully in theirs primes.

 

his face doesn't look like vitali was running ! what a cry baby he was fighting back tears the whole interview
:-( i bet he throws his playstation controller down when he loses

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KluoV6jKW10&feature=related[/ame] new clip of chris arreola as a child

 

What a dumb debate. Dude, Adamek's accomplishments outstrip Haye's any day of the week. Haye has only taken 4 genuinely competitive fights in his career--Carl Thompson, N. Valuev, Fragomeni, and Mormeck. The only prime fighter on that list is Fragomeni, and he was never a world title level fighter. Valuev was definitely shot (dreadful in his last 2 fights) and Mormeck was certainly post-prime.

Adamek's wins (against Cunningham, Banks, Arreola, and others) demolish Haye's resume. All 3 of those guys were prime or near prime when Adamek fought them. Plus Adamek's light heavy and cruiser and early heavy runs are full of opponents who are consistently better than Haye opponents.

If Haye had fought a prime Cunningham and some of the other champs and fringe contenders like Huck, Wlod or Lebedev then he would deserve to be called an undisputed cruiser champion---but beating a Mormeck on the downslide does not an ATG make.

The only reason Haye is rated higher than Adamek is when he wins he tends to win more impressively, and he has gotten ahold of a WBA paper belt. Adamek by contrast has been in close war after close war. But there is no way in hell Haye will be remembered as taking on better competition than Adamek.