Langford or Pep, who has the better resume?

Obviously Langford. Your boy isn't very informed.

 

Langford. Easy question.

 

the posts above me have already answered but I just would also like to stress that this is not close

 

my opinion is that Langford has a better resume, it explains itself really. Everytime I comment on Pep's resume I'm mistakenly informed by posters who are quick to jump to conclusions that I am underrating Pep's resume and that I mustn't know about it, which is silly. I know all about the contenders he beat. He is possibly better than Langford, that much would make for a fine debate, he is one of the best boxers of all time hands down, let's not misconstrue my opinion on Willie Pep the boxer. Compare their resumes and you should come to the same conclusion as me that Langford has a greater resume than Pep.

 

I think we should refrain from elevating Pep's resume to something higher than we really know it isn't. No disrespect to Willie Pep, maybe the best pure boxer of all time. He has a fine resume, Langford's is on another level.

 

I'm used to it by now. It annoys me everytime I have to deal with backlash on my statements regarding Ali and Pep, as if I'm disrespecting Willie Pep or something, it's quite silly.

 

A resume isn't judged only by who beat the better fighters. It's also judged by longevity, dominance, avoiding losses to lesser opposition etc.

 

teeto is clearly a Pep hater. You can tell by the way he consistently demeans his resume.

 

please forgive me God.