Marquez won both fights. If you took the k.d's out the 1st fight it wasnt even close. Marquez still won. Marquez won the 2nd too, again, clearly IMO
I scored it for Marquez at the time, not scored it since. It was close and i could see the argument for Pac getting the nod.
Draw for the first fight-take the Knockdowns away and JMM schooled him but thats not how things work. Second i had Pac by a point.
first time i watched it a had pacman winning. second time i watched it i had marquez winning. aqlot of close rounds
I don't think Marquez was robbed a lot of people seem to say this I hate It when people use the word "robbed" to describe a close fight I had Marquez by 114 - 113 at the time.
I had it 115-114 Marquez. I thought Marquez won but not a robbery. Just depends how you scored the close rounds.
haha this thread keeps coming up, luckily I saved my scorecard. Round 1: tough round to score but pacquiao won it round 2: marquez round 3: only kd in the fight and a 10-8 pac round round 4: pacquiao round 5: marquez round 6: marquez round 7: pacquiao round 8: marquez round 9: pacquiao round 10: pacquiao round 11: marquez round 12: marquez Final score: 114-113 pacquiao, knock down gets him the win. And like said before, it depends on who you give the first round to, most of the other rounds are easier to score but thats one is the difference maker, im very sure that everyone that gives this to marquez has him winning round 1. pacquiao winning closely,marquez winning closely or a draw are all fair scorecards. Definitely not a robbery, I dont get why people talk more about their first fight which was razorclose as well, its always this one.
I had it: Pacquiao - Marquez Round 1: 10-10 Round 2: 9-10 Round 3: 10-8 Round 4: 10-9 Round 5: 9-10 Round 6: 9-10 Round 7: 10-10 Round 8: 9-10 Round 9: 10-9 Round 10: 10-9 Round 11: 9-10 Round 12: 9-10 Final score: 114-115 Marquez