In a p4p fight, how many rounds does Tyson last against Pac?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by EgoyLover, May 12, 2011.


  1. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest


    :lol:

    You hate Pac so much, that even in a p4p match-up against a one-dimensional fighter you cant even give him credit. You say his style changes from welter to heavy, without explaining how, while everyone knows he fights the same at welter like he did at bantam. His power punch is still his straight left/ hook, his in an out movement is still there, he moves the same hell he still looks the same. You just a sorry and hateful old man who picked the wrong guy in the Pacfan vs. ***** debates. :hi:
     
  2. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    OK. How?
     
  3. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Yeah in, no contest in Mike's favour.
     
  4. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    What, Buster Douglas has a better chin p4p than Erik Morales now?

    Lewis -- I got KTFOd by Rahman -- has better chin p4p than Marco Antonio Barrera now?
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    you cannot compare. Heavyweights are sbigger with different tactics and slower pace. And even if you could, saying Pacman would win easily might not be the case. Tyson might get Pacman on the ropes and land to the body and then come up the head and stop Manny on the ropes. Tyson was so great in his prime from 1986-1989
     
  6. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    1. No you're not.
    2. Pac did the impossible from 122 to 147, retaining EVERYTHING. And what Im posing is a p4p match-up at heavy, which really isnt hard to comprehend, unless you just a Pachater, which obviously you are.
    3. No basis for saying that, you reaching. Pac does not have to look like Lewis when he fights at 200.
    4. So you admit that Pac can increase weight without losing anything. And Im talking in p4p sense, so GTFO with that 'long arms" stupid theory of yours.
    5. If he was slower HW, then his opponents would be slower. Im speaking in relative terms, something your mind obviously cant comprehend.
    6. You're one old hateful Pacquiao hater. :hi:
     
  7. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    P4p. I know its a hard concept to understand but keep on trying.

    Tyson's skills are so below Pac's level hell Pac might even win in a catchweight fight. :hi:
     
  8. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Show me your boobs you ugly *****.
     
  9. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    Here's one dude who's gets so butthurt with all my threads. :lol:
     
  10. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    "Relative" and "p4p" seem to be concepts so hard for you to understand. Or maybe, you do understand, but refuse to acknowledge or see. Because none is blinder than the ****** who refuses to see. Thus, you either a moron, or a hater. Maybe both. :hi:
     
  11. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    I'm going to eat your face.
     
  12. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    Fixed. :lol:
     
  13. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Nice comeback bro.

    I guess your cool, truce?
     
  14. EgoyLover

    EgoyLover Guest

    Nah. You'll be hating me more, I got tons of Pac threads coming up! :lol:
     
  15. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    How many?, give me a figure please.