If it was you.....be honest

atsch You'd let Floyd beat your momma then deny it happened....

 

I'm retired. I have other things outside the ring right now.

 

I would **** Floyd up if he touched any woman in my family. Just bc you let him beat your momma doesn't mean others would.

 

Sure....before of after you askedf for his autograph.

"Yo yo Money...sign my momma's bruised lip!" :rofl

 

The answer for anyone should be an emphatic YES. This is not something as petty as declining an invitation to a party. It's become an enormous issue. The problem can be easily resolved if Pac would make a small effort. If Pac undergoes stringent testing and passes then what else can the Mayweathers say? The only way for Floyd to counter is to fight Manny in the ring. By taking the tests Manny provides a win-win situation for himself and his fans.

I hate blood tests. So in a way I can relate to Pac. But my displeasure for blood tests is one of the reasons why I'm not a pro boxer. Pac chose to go into his profession in which blood tests, whether unprecedented or not, comes with the territory of the sport. Pac should take a page out of Nonito Donaire's book. Don't be a ***** and challenge an unprecedented drug test. Don't let it challenge YOU.

 

I see you want to get off topic bc you know your ***** ass wouldn't take any test or step inside a ring to fight anyone under any circumstances. We understand since you are a keyboard warrior. My mom would shoot Floyd by the way you little *****.

 

I'd take a reasonable random blood test, reasonable meaning I'd be guaranteed I wouldn't be tested in days leading up to fight because losing red blood cells robs you of energy, but at the same time if I decided to cheat in those cutoff days, I'd still be caught when they blood test me after the fight.

Basically, I am willing to do what Pac is willing to do: take a reasonable random test.

 

:deal

 

Pac agreed to reasonable random tests, reasonable meaning he'd be caught if he tried to cheat with the post fight blood test. Yet, he is held suspicious for not agreeing to 100% of Floyd's demands.

Bernard Hopkins, a still near elite fighter in his mid 40s, threw a fit of rage when Pascal suggested OSDT, yet no one here on ESB even thinks twice about it.

How do you feel about that? You must feel something. You're always crying about the double standards Floyd has to endure.

 

The problem with Hopkins is that the fight was already signed and Pascal didn't put it in the contract. To be honest Hopkins should do a blood test too and beat Pascal's ass but Pasca; should have put the **** in contract to give Hopkins the option to accept it or deny. Floyd wanted testing from the start and put it in writing.

 

Has nothing to do if it was signed already or not. Many claim Pac is suspicious for his actions, which in this case was to agree to random blood testing with cutoff dates, which somehow translates to "refusal" and "sign of guilt" to his haters.

If Hopkins-Pascal was already signed, that's more of a reason for Hopkins not to throw a fit of rage because it was a done deal, in which case Pascal looks like the ass. Yet, Hopkins "behavior" is overlooked by the same people who claim Pac's "behavior" is suspicious- someone who actually tried to work in getting random testing done with some compromises as opposed to someone who became violently enraged at the very same suggestion. :think

 

hmm.. if i had millions of money.. and am the P4P #1 fighter in the world..

right off the bat, id say **** off

 

Pascal should have asked for the test before the fight was signed. Hopkins should take the test and beat that ass but it still doesn't change the fact that Pascal didn't go about it the right way.

 

Off topic? atsch This is only a big topic to your floyd ***gots. And of course YOU would take the test. You'd do ANYTHING Floyd asked. You have no balls, nor do you have an guts to stand up for what you believe.

 

Only people who would say the hell with it im clean as we seen in the past are people like Mark Mcgwire, Barry Bonds and Jose Canseco!