Most impressive: McCallum-Watson or Hopkins-Tito

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, May 12, 2011.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,643
    14,010
    Jan 4, 2008
    Which one of these great perfomances impresses you most and why?
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    Watson was a good fighter but never the fighter Tito was. Hopkins beating Tito was two elite guys fighting. Watson was good, but not the top top level and when McCallum beat him, Watson was not very experienced.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,643
    14,010
    Jan 4, 2008
    Watson accomplished more at MW, though, wouldn't you say? He beat Benn and should have had gotten the win in the first fight against Eubank. What opponents of that calibre do you mean Tito beat at MW?

    Watson came off his best win when facing McCallum.
     
  4. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    voted hopkins-trinidad because tito was a pimp; don't need to justify it beyond that
     
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    well yeah Tito didn't accomplish much at middleweight. But Tito was a much better fighter than Watson. McCallum's best win was against Curry, and still I think Hopkins win over Tito is bigger than that one. Many people were picking Tito to blast Hopkins out. As it turned out he barely won a round.
     
  6. tito had more experience and better power than watson , but i wouldnt say he was a much better fighter , watson was a good fighter himself he beat nigel benn when he was undefeated and had knocked out every opponent he'd faced , he then went on to fight eubanks later and won the fight however he was robbed , and then went on to fight eubanks again where he was well ahead on all scorecards until he was caught with a peach of an uppercut.
     
  7. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    186
    May 16, 2009
    McCallum vs Watson, for me tito fighting above his best weight and for me Watson was the better middleweight out of the two challenger's .plus i was there at the McCallum/watson fight
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,488
    30,298
    Jun 2, 2006
    McCallum was a fighter coming up through the weights taking on a decent sized , good middle weight.
    Hopkins was a former light heavy ,taking on a guy, coming up through the weights.
    It depends if you think it is more noteworthy, that Bernard stopped a quality champion like Tito,who was really a smaller man, or, if you give more kudos to McCallum beating a good class middle weight.
    MIckey Duff who handled Watson at that time did not want the match against McCallum and they fell out over it. Duff was proved right,he usually was.
     
  9. Goyourownway

    Goyourownway Insanity enthusiast Full Member

    2,667
    21
    Feb 13, 2011
    Trinidad had carried his power up to the weight and demolished a world class middleweight.Didn't just beat him,didn't just dominate him - he demolished him! And he looked awesome in doing so.



    As impressive a performance as it was from McCallum,Hopkins dominating and shutting out an elite fighter,who had already shown himself as being a threat in the division,has to be more highly regarded than a win over a guy who was just barely world class at that point.



    Watson wasn't robbed against Eubank,either.
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,643
    14,010
    Jan 4, 2008
    Barely world class? After convincingly beating Benn and being one year away from the first Eubank fight? I think he was the favourite in the fight, which tells us something.

    On the other hand, McCallum was nearing 35 and above his best weight. Watson was clearly nearer his prime.

    "Robbed" is a word that gets thrown around much too often... I think Watson won the fight. Let's leave it at that.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    my opinion is illinformed and naive but i'm saying b-hop
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,488
    30,298
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tito had two wins at 160lbs, both over guys whose middleweight victims are not worth talking about, Watson was just coming of a ko of Nigel Benn.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,700
    51,536
    Mar 21, 2007
    Really close. I nearly did that thing of voting for McCallum because the vote wasn't close and I feel it should be. In the end though the board has this one right.
     
  14. CassiusClayAli

    CassiusClayAli Active Member Full Member

    1,050
    14
    Mar 3, 2010
    this one is not close!!!! McCallum never had a win against a guy like Tito I regret to say. At Junior MId Tito Trindidad might have stopped the overrated Mike McCAllum!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  15. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,137
    5,764
    Feb 26, 2009
    :happy:happy